TSTP Solution File: SWV288-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV288-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.43s
% Output : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.15 % Problem : SWV288-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:12:48 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.23/0.40 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.23/0.40 Tue Jun 14 17:12:48 2022
% 0.23/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9559.
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.23/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.23/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 list(usable).
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.23/0.40 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.23/0.40 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.23/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 ------------> process sos:
% 0.23/0.40
% 0.23/0.40 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.23/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.23/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.23/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.23/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.23/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.23/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.23/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 88
% 0.23/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 26
% 0.23/0.43 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.23/0.43 distinct function count: 12
% 0.23/0.43 distinct constant count: 13
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.23/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.02 sec ----> 15 [hyper,13,6,9,7,unit_del,1,2] {-} $F.
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.23/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 1 [] {+} -c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.23/0.43 2 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.23/0.43 3 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(A,B,C),c_List_Oset(D,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,D)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.43 4 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.43 5 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.43 6 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(B,C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(C),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(B),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(C)))))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u7f(B,C,E,D,A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E)))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.23/0.43 7 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.23/0.43 8 [] {+} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B_H,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.23/0.43 9 [] {-} c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)).
% 0.23/0.43 11 [hyper,8,3] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.43 12 [hyper,11,5] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.43 13 [hyper,12,4] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.43 15 [hyper,13,6,9,7,unit_del,1,2] {-} $F.
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.23/0.43 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 ============ end of search ============
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 true clauses given 5 (71.4%)
% 0.23/0.43 false clauses given 2
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 FALSE TRUE
% 0.23/0.43 24 0 1
% 0.23/0.43 tot: 0 1 (100.0% true)
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.23/0.43
% 0.23/0.43 Process 9559 finished Tue Jun 14 17:12:48 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------