TSTP Solution File: SWV288-1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV288-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B_H,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B_H,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u7f(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u7f(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_ONA__Crypt__imp__Server__msg_0)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : SWV288-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 04:43:56 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.39  % symbols: 242
% 0.14/0.39  % clauses: 1687
% 0.14/0.39  % start clauses: 5
% 0.14/0.39  % iterative deepening steps: 24
% 0.14/0.39  % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.14/0.39  % literal attempts: 5365
% 0.14/0.39  % depth failures: 4681
% 0.14/0.39  % regularity failures: 79
% 0.14/0.39  % tautology failures: 123
% 0.14/0.39  % reductions: 266
% 0.14/0.39  % extensions: 5015
% 0.14/0.39  % SAT variables: 5219
% 0.14/0.39  % SAT clauses: 4528
% 0.14/0.39  % WalkSAT solutions: 4523
% 0.14/0.39  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------