TSTP Solution File: SWV286-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV286-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV286-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 04:37:26 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.37 Thu Jun 16 04:37:26 2022
% 0.21/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28136.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.21/0.37 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.21/0.37 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.21/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 8
% 0.21/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.21/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.21/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 87
% 0.21/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 22
% 0.21/0.40 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.21/0.40 distinct function count: 10
% 0.21/0.40 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.02 sec ----> 10 [hyper,9,2,8,unit_del,4,5] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Length of proof is 1. Level of proof is 1.
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 1 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(B,C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(C,F,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(F),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(C),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(F)))))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,F,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(F),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(C,F,E,D,A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E)))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.21/0.40 2 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(D),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(F,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(E)))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(D),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__vEb(D,B,C,F,A),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(F,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(D),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.21/0.40 3 [] {+} -c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.21/0.40 4 [] {+} -c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.21/0.40 5 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.21/0.40 6 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B_H,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.21/0.40 7 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.21/0.40 8 [] {+} c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)).
% 0.21/0.40 9 [hyper,8,1,6,7,unit_del,3] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.21/0.40 10 [hyper,9,2,8,unit_del,4,5] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.40 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 true clauses given 1 (25.0%)
% 0.21/0.40 false clauses given 3
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 FALSE TRUE
% 0.21/0.40 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Process 28136 finished Thu Jun 16 04:37:26 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------