TSTP Solution File: SWV286-1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV286-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 27.89s 3.93s
% Output   : Proof 27.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B_H,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B_H,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_OA__trusts__OR4__dest_0)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__vEb(v_A,v_B,v_NA,v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_OOR3__imp__OR2__dest_0)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__vEb(v_A,v_B,v_NA,v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_sko__u8o(v_A,v_B,v_K,v_NA,v_evs),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV286-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 06:03:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 27.89/3.93  % symbols: 243
% 27.89/3.93  % clauses: 1693
% 27.89/3.93  % start clauses: 6
% 27.89/3.93  % iterative deepening steps: 3010
% 27.89/3.93  % maximum path limit: 3
% 27.89/3.93  % literal attempts: 8386603
% 27.89/3.93  % depth failures: 7517159
% 27.89/3.93  % regularity failures: 138271
% 27.89/3.93  % tautology failures: 150459
% 27.89/3.93  % reductions: 279344
% 27.89/3.93  % extensions: 8094340
% 27.89/3.93  % SAT variables: 407752
% 27.89/3.93  % SAT clauses: 427070
% 27.89/3.93  % WalkSAT solutions: 427068
% 27.89/3.93  % CDCL solutions: 1
% 27.89/3.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 27.89/3.93  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------