TSTP Solution File: SWV284-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWV284-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:13:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.19s 1.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(X0,v_x(X0),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_N,X0,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(X1),X0,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat),X2,tc_nat)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat),X2,tc_nat)
| c_lessequals(X0,X2,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).
cnf(c_82,plain,
c_insert(v_msg,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_83,plain,
c_Message_Oparts(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_84,plain,
c_Event_Oused(v_list) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),sP2_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_84,c_82,c_83]) ).
cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),sP2_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_N,X0,tc_nat) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).
cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(X0,v_x(X0),tc_nat),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_275,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(X0),tc_nat)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_86]) ).
cnf(c_287,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_295,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_301,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Message_Oparts(sP0_iProver_def),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),X0,tc_nat) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_302,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),X0,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_301,c_83]) ).
cnf(c_326,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(c_plus(X0,v_sko__upX(v_msg),tc_nat))),sP1_iProver_def,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_287,c_302]) ).
cnf(c_341,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(c_plus(X0,v_sko__upX(v_msg),tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_275,c_326]) ).
cnf(c_347,plain,
$false,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_295,c_341]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV284-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:38:06 EDT 2024
% 0.20/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.19/1.20 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ iProver source info
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.19/1.20 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.19/1.20 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 clauses 9
% 2.19/1.20 conjectures 3
% 2.19/1.20 EPR 0
% 2.19/1.20 Horn 8
% 2.19/1.20 unary 4
% 2.19/1.20 binary 5
% 2.19/1.20 lits 14
% 2.19/1.20 lits eq 3
% 2.19/1.20 fd_pure 0
% 2.19/1.20 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.19/1.20 fd_cond 0
% 2.19/1.20 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.19/1.20 AC symbols 0
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------
% 2.19/1.20 Current options:
% 2.19/1.20 ------
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.19/1.20
% 2.19/1.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------