TSTP Solution File: SWV284-2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV284-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:54:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  10   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  21   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f24,f13]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat),X2,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(resolution,[],[f9,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X2,X3,tc_nat),X4,tc_nat)
      | c_lessequals(X3,X4,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(resolution,[],[f6,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(X0),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X2,X3,tc_nat),X4,tc_nat)
      | c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(c_plus(X0,v_sko__upX(v_msg),tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(resolution,[],[f14,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_x(c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5,f1]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),v_x(X0),tc_nat)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(X0),tc_nat) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f11,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_N,X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),v_x(X0),tc_nat) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f4,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(X1),X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV284-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 07:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (31201)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75  
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)Memory used [KB]: 950
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31201)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31196)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31199)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31197)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (31200)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (31198)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75  
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)Memory used [KB]: 950
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75  
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)Memory used [KB]: 948
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31198)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31200)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31199)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-31194"
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31197)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (31202)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75  
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31202)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.75  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.75  
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)Memory used [KB]: 976
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.75  % (31195)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.55/0.75  % (31194)Success in time 0.387 s
% 0.55/0.75  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------