TSTP Solution File: SWV284-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : SWV284-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art08.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2794MHz
% Memory : 1003MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 19.8s
% Output : Assurance 19.8s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21368/SWV/SWV284-1+eq_r.in
%
% Some predicates or functions were curried and renamed.
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: big
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 28 #f 4 7)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 4 7)
% (binary-double 11 #f 4 7)
% (binary-double 17 #f)
% (binary-double 17 #t)
% (binary 87 #t 4 7)
% (binary-order 28 #f 4 7)
% (binary-posweight-order 58 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 11 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 28 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder-sos 17 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (hyper-order 17 #f)
% (binary 141 #t)
%
%
% **** EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED ****
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(1449,40,6,2898,0,12,248199,4,2117)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 2887 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^nonce(X),c_^message_^oparts(c_insert(Y,c_emptyset,tc_^message_^omsg)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_lessequals($ganapfun1($ganc72,Y),X,tc_nat).
% 3048 [?] ?
% 3087 [?] ?
% 248670 [binary:3087,2887,slowcut:3048] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using binary resolution
% not using sos strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 7
% clause depth limited to 4
% seconds given: 28
%
%
% old unit clauses discarded
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 2176
% derived clauses: 682344
% kept clauses: 77034
% kept size sum: 0
% kept mid-nuclei: 16113
% kept new demods: 32
% forw unit-subs: 92389
% forw double-subs: 17134
% forw overdouble-subs: 1461
% backward subs: 17
% fast unit cutoff: 445
% full unit cutoff: 874
% dbl unit cutoff: 191
% real runtime : 22.2
% process. runtime: 21.85
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 10888
% length fails: 609
% strength fails: 34
% predlist fails: 249
% aux str. fails: 32
% by-lit fails: 25
% full subs tried: 9933
% full subs fail: 8469
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP21368/SWV/SWV284-1+eq_r.in")
% WARNING: TreeLimitedRun lost 19.83s, total lost is 19.83s
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------