TSTP Solution File: SWV284-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV284-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8YThZwq0ta/E---3.1_31477.p',cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X1)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8YThZwq0ta/E---3.1_31477.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_N,X1,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8YThZwq0ta/E---3.1_31477.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X2,X3,tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X3,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8YThZwq0ta/E---3.1_31477.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8YThZwq0ta/E---3.1_31477.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X3,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8YThZwq0ta/E---3.1_31477.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X1)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_N,X1,tc_nat) ),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_x(X1)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),v_x(X1),tc_nat) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X2,X3,tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X3,tc_nat) ),
cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_msg),v_x(X1),tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(X1),tc_nat) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(X1,v_x(c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),X3,tc_nat) ),
cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_N,v_x(c_plus(X1,v_sko__upX(v_msg),tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(X1,v_x(c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWV284-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:17:14 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.53 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8YThZwq0ta/E---3.1_31477.p
% 0.39/0.80 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.39/0.80 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.80 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 31554 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.39/0.80 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.80 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.80 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.80 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 31564 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Result found by G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.39/0.80 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.80 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.80 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.80 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.80 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.39/0.80 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.39/0.80
% 0.39/0.80 # Proof found!
% 0.39/0.80 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.39/0.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.80 # Parsed axioms : 1448
% 0.39/0.80 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Initial clauses : 1448
% 0.39/0.80 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.39/0.80 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1445
% 0.39/0.80 # Processed clauses : 3164
% 0.39/0.80 # ...of these trivial : 28
% 0.39/0.80 # ...subsumed : 316
% 0.39/0.80 # ...remaining for further processing : 2820
% 0.39/0.80 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.39/0.80 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.39/0.80 # Backward-rewritten : 26
% 0.39/0.80 # Generated clauses : 1898
% 0.39/0.80 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 826
% 0.39/0.80 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.39/0.80 # Paramodulations : 1845
% 0.39/0.80 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # NegExts : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Equation resolutions : 53
% 0.39/0.80 # Total rewrite steps : 1162
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.80 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.80 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.80 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.80 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.80 # Current number of processed clauses : 1401
% 0.39/0.80 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 200
% 0.39/0.80 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Negative unit clauses : 48
% 0.39/0.80 # Non-unit-clauses : 1153
% 0.39/0.80 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 476
% 0.39/0.80 # ...number of literals in the above : 1162
% 0.39/0.80 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Current number of archived clauses : 1420
% 0.39/0.80 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1020263
% 0.39/0.80 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 989705
% 0.39/0.80 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 264
% 0.39/0.80 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13437
% 0.39/0.80 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # BW rewrite match attempts : 90
% 0.39/0.80 # BW rewrite match successes : 20
% 0.39/0.80 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.39/0.80 # Termbank termtop insertions : 49037
% 0.39/0.80
% 0.39/0.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.80 # User time : 0.217 s
% 0.39/0.80 # System time : 0.015 s
% 0.39/0.80 # Total time : 0.232 s
% 0.39/0.80 # Maximum resident set size: 3896 pages
% 0.39/0.80
% 0.39/0.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.80 # User time : 1.065 s
% 0.39/0.80 # System time : 0.040 s
% 0.39/0.80 # Total time : 1.106 s
% 0.39/0.80 # Maximum resident set size: 2456 pages
% 0.39/0.80 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------