TSTP Solution File: SWV283-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SWV283-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:44:02 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  28   ~;  34   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   7 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f58,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f18,f19,f37,f38,f57]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f46,f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat)),tc_nat)
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3,f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X2,X3,tc_nat),X4,tc_nat)
      | c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ c_lessequals(v_x,v_xd(c_plus(X0,v_sko__upX(v_xc),tc_nat)),tc_nat)
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f44,f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat)),tc_nat)
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f17]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X2,X3,tc_nat),X4,tc_nat)
      | c_lessequals(X3,X4,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_xc),v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
        | ~ c_lessequals(v_x,v_xd(X0),tc_nat) )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f43,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_x,X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
        | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_xc),v_xd(X0),tc_nat) )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f36,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(X1),X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
        | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
        | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f35,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> sP1 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X6] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X6)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X6)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ sP1 ),
    inference(general_splitting,[],[f6,f9_D]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | sP1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9_D]) ).

fof(f9_D,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
        | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) )
  <=> ~ sP1 ),
    introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP1])]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X6] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X6)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X6)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f35,f31]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f16,f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> sP0 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( c_lessequals(X5,v_xd(X5),tc_nat)
      | ~ sP0 ),
    inference(general_splitting,[],[f5,f7_D]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
      | sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7_D]) ).

fof(f7_D,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
  <=> ~ sP0 ),
    introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X5] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
      | c_lessequals(X5,v_xd(X5),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f7,f16,f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem    : SWV283-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.16  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 04:50:16 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.38  % (8783)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.21/0.39  % (8785)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39  % (8790)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39  % (8788)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39  % (8786)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39  % (8789)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39  % (8787)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39  % (8786)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.40  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,max,1,1,max,1,max,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,max,1,1,max,1,max,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.40  % (8784)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [2,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  % (8788)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [2,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  % (8789)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)Memory used [KB]: 764
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (8786)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (8783)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------