TSTP Solution File: SWV283-2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV283-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:42:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   6 unt;   3 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(u),v,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(u,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV283-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(u,v,tc_nat),w,tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(v,w,tc_nat) ),
    file('SWV283-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(u,v,tc_nat),w,tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(u,w,tc_nat) ),
    file('SWV283-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_x,u,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(u),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV283-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(u,v_xd(u),tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(v,v_xd(v),tc_nat) ),
    file('SWV283-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(u)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(u)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(v)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(v)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV283-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    c_lessequals(u,v_xd(u),tc_nat),
    inference(con,[status(thm)],[5]),
    [iquote('0:Con:5.1')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(u)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(u)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(con,[status(thm)],[6]),
    [iquote('0:Con:6.2')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    c_lessequals(u,v_xd(c_plus(u,v,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,3]),
    [iquote('0:Res:7.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    c_lessequals(u,v_xd(c_plus(v,u,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,2]),
    [iquote('0:Res:7.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    c_lessequals(u,v_xd(c_plus(v,c_plus(u,w,tc_nat),tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,3]),
    [iquote('0:Res:11.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_xc),v_xd(u),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(u)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:8.1,1.1')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_xc),v_xd(u),tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_x,v_xd(u),tc_nat) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:29.1,4.1')] ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_x,v_xd(c_plus(v_sko__upX(v_xc),u,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,30]),
    [iquote('0:Res:9.0,30.0')] ).

cnf(41,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[32,14]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:32.0,14.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SWV283-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 06:44:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS derived 32 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 38 clauses.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS allocated 63161 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 15 :
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.41  Formulae used in the proof : cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0 cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0 cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1 cls_conjecture_0 cls_conjecture_4 cls_conjecture_9
% 0.19/0.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------