TSTP Solution File: SWV283-1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SWV283-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:32:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.01s 1.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   7 unt;   5 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(X1),X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Omsg__Nonce__supply_0) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat),X2,tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat),X2,tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(X0,X2,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).

cnf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X0),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_x,X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(X1,v_xd(X1),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(c_89,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_lessequals(X1,v_xd(X1),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

cnf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X1)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).

cnf(c_23710,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ sP0_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP0_iProver_split])],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_23711,negated_conjecture,
    sP0_iProver_split,
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_23712,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
    | ~ sP1_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP1_iProver_split])],[c_89]) ).

cnf(c_23714,negated_conjecture,
    sP1_iProver_split,
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_85]) ).

cnf(c_30490,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(X0),tc_nat),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_23712,c_23712,c_23714]) ).

cnf(c_30502,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_xc,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_23710,c_23710,c_23711]) ).

cnf(c_30892,plain,
    c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(c_plus(X1,X0,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_30490,c_51]) ).

cnf(c_30902,plain,
    c_lessequals(X0,v_xd(c_plus(X0,X1,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_30490,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_34496,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_xc),v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xd(X0)),c_Event_Oused(v_list),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_30502,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_34578,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__upX(v_xc),v_xd(X0),tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_x,v_xd(X0),tc_nat) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_34496,c_81]) ).

cnf(c_34587,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_x,v_xd(c_plus(X0,v_sko__upX(v_xc),tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_30892,c_34578]) ).

cnf(c_35250,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_30902,c_34587]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SWV283-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 06:38:38 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 8.01/1.69  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.01/1.69  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------  iProver source info
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 8.01/1.69  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 8.01/1.69  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.01/1.69  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Parsing...successful
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 823 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 69 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 6 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Proving...
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Problem Properties 
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  clauses                                 399
% 8.01/1.69  conjectures                             11
% 8.01/1.69  EPR                                     33
% 8.01/1.69  Horn                                    359
% 8.01/1.69  unary                                   112
% 8.01/1.69  binary                                  228
% 8.01/1.69  lits                                    745
% 8.01/1.69  lits eq                                 233
% 8.01/1.69  fd_pure                                 0
% 8.01/1.69  fd_pseudo                               0
% 8.01/1.69  fd_cond                                 21
% 8.01/1.69  fd_pseudo_cond                          64
% 8.01/1.69  AC symbols                              0
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ 
% 8.01/1.69  Current options:
% 8.01/1.69  ------ 
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  ------ Proving...
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.01/1.69  
% 8.01/1.69  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------