TSTP Solution File: SWV281-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV281-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 12 unt; 4 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 15 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t1aMeP5Gos/E---3.1_28542.p',cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t1aMeP5Gos/E---3.1_28542.p',cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Oop_A_L_Oadd__0_0,axiom,
c_plus(c_0,X1,tc_nat) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t1aMeP5Gos/E---3.1_28542.p',cls_Nat_Oop_A_L_Oadd__0_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t1aMeP5Gos/E---3.1_28542.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Onat__add__right__cancel_0,axiom,
( X1 = X3
| c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat) != c_plus(X3,X2,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t1aMeP5Gos/E---3.1_28542.p',cls_Nat_Onat__add__right__cancel_0) ).
cnf(cls_List_Olist_Odistinct__1_0,axiom,
c_List_Olist_ONil != c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t1aMeP5Gos/E---3.1_28542.p',cls_List_Olist_Odistinct__1_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_plus(X1,v_sko__urX(X2),tc_nat)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_plus(c_0,X1,tc_nat) = X1,
cls_Nat_Oop_A_L_Oadd__0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_sko__urX(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( v_sko__urX(v_evs) = X1
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
v_sko__urX(v_evs) = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( X1 = X3
| c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat) != c_plus(X3,X2,tc_nat) ),
cls_Nat_Onat__add__right__cancel_0 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_plus(X1,v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),tc_nat) = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
c_List_Olist_ONil != c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X2,X3),
cls_List_Olist_Odistinct__1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
X1 = X2,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWV281-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:59:59 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t1aMeP5Gos/E---3.1_28542.p
% 0.16/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 28620 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.42 # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42 # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28625 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.42 # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42 # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.42
% 0.16/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.16/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.16/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.16/0.42 # Processed clauses : 30
% 0.16/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.16/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.16/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 0.16/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 17
% 0.16/0.42 # Generated clauses : 83
% 0.16/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 75
% 0.16/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Paramodulations : 74
% 0.16/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.16/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.16/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 51
% 0.16/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 149
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.16/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.16/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.16/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.16/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 81
% 0.16/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 53
% 0.16/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 979
% 0.16/0.42
% 0.16/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1632 pages
% 0.16/0.42
% 0.16/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.16/0.42 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.16/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------