TSTP Solution File: SWV280-2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV280-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:39 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZDZpi5O6fT/E---3.1_21210.p',cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZDZpi5O6fT/E---3.1_21210.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZDZpi5O6fT/E---3.1_21210.p',cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
    cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(v_evs),X1,tc_nat),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),tc_nat),
    cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SWV280-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:25:07 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZDZpi5O6fT/E---3.1_21210.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # sh5l with pid 21290 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FUHNS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # partial match(2): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 21297 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FUHNS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # partial match(2): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 117
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------