TSTP Solution File: SWV280-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV280-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aF7fIIEvB0/E---3.1_1206.p',cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aF7fIIEvB0/E---3.1_1206.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aF7fIIEvB0/E---3.1_1206.p',cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(v_evs),X1,tc_nat),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : SWV280-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:40:22 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aF7fIIEvB0/E---3.1_1206.p
% 0.15/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # sh5l with pid 1287 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FUHNS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # partial match(2): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1293 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FUHNS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # partial match(2): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.15/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 117
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.15/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------