TSTP Solution File: SWV279-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV279-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 42.24s 300.26s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 55 ( 14 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1,axiom,
c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
cls_Set_OsubsetD_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X3,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X3,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X1),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_19]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.32 % Problem : SWV279-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.33 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.32/0.53 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.32/0.53 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.32/0.53 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.32/0.53 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.32/0.53 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.32/0.53 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.32/0.53 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.32/0.53 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:15:37 EDT 2023
% 0.32/0.53 % CPUTime :
% 0.77/0.97 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.77/0.97 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1AbjZEA1Es/E---3.1_3494.p
% 42.24/300.26 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 42.24/300.26 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 42.24/300.26 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # new_bool_3 with pid 3647 completed with status 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 42.24/300.26 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 42.24/300.26 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 42.24/300.26 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 42.24/300.26 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 3650 completed with status 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 42.24/300.26 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 42.24/300.26 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 42.24/300.26 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 42.24/300.26 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 42.24/300.26 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 42.24/300.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 42.24/300.26
% 42.24/300.26 # Proof found!
% 42.24/300.26 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 42.24/300.26 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 42.24/300.26 # Parsed axioms : 2918
% 42.24/300.26 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2407
% 42.24/300.26 # Initial clauses : 511
% 42.24/300.26 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Initial clauses in saturation : 511
% 42.24/300.26 # Processed clauses : 7305
% 42.24/300.26 # ...of these trivial : 129
% 42.24/300.26 # ...subsumed : 4120
% 42.24/300.26 # ...remaining for further processing : 3056
% 42.24/300.26 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 45
% 42.24/300.26 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Backward-subsumed : 79
% 42.24/300.26 # Backward-rewritten : 113
% 42.24/300.26 # Generated clauses : 131135
% 42.24/300.26 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 121301
% 42.24/300.26 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 23
% 42.24/300.26 # Paramodulations : 131035
% 42.24/300.26 # Factorizations : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # NegExts : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Equation resolutions : 100
% 42.24/300.26 # Total rewrite steps : 65054
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional check models : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 42.24/300.26 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 42.24/300.26 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 42.24/300.26 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 42.24/300.26 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 42.24/300.26 # Current number of processed clauses : 2864
% 42.24/300.26 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 386
% 42.24/300.26 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11
% 42.24/300.26 # Negative unit clauses : 288
% 42.24/300.26 # Non-unit-clauses : 2179
% 42.24/300.26 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 114256
% 42.24/300.26 # ...number of literals in the above : 330576
% 42.24/300.26 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Current number of archived clauses : 192
% 42.24/300.26 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 883321
% 42.24/300.26 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 588507
% 42.24/300.26 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1488
% 42.24/300.26 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 128974
% 42.24/300.26 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # BW rewrite match attempts : 837
% 42.24/300.26 # BW rewrite match successes : 72
% 42.24/300.26 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Condensation successes : 0
% 42.24/300.26 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2742068
% 42.24/300.26
% 42.24/300.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 42.24/300.26 # User time : 3.306 s
% 42.24/300.26 # System time : 0.103 s
% 42.24/300.26 # Total time : 3.410 s
% 42.24/300.26 # Maximum resident set size: 4600 pages
% 42.24/300.26
% 42.24/300.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 42.24/300.26 # User time : 3.353 s
% 42.24/300.26 # System time : 0.109 s
% 42.24/300.26 # Total time : 3.463 s
% 42.24/300.26 # Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
% 42.24/300.26 % E---3.1 exiting
% 42.24/300.26 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------