TSTP Solution File: SWV278-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 2 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lieW14j36P/E---3.1_16654.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0,axiom,
c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lieW14j36P/E---3.1_16654.p',cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lieW14j36P/E---3.1_16654.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lieW14j36P/E---3.1_16654.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)) = X1,
cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:21:44 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lieW14j36P/E---3.1_16654.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # new_bool_3 with pid 16743 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF11-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # partial match(1): FHUSF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 16747 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF11-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # partial match(1): FHUSF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 97
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------