TSTP Solution File: SWV278-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 09:36:52 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.73 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.73 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.73 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.73 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.73 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.73 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.73
% 0.19/0.73 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.73 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.73 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.74 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.74 % File : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.19/0.74 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.19/0.74 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for events
% 0.19/0.74 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.74 % English :
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.74 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.19/0.74 % Names :
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.74 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.19/0.74 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 0.19/0.74 % Number of literals : 5 ( 1 equ; 2 neg)
% 0.19/0.74 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.74 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.74 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.19/0.74 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.19/0.74 % Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.74 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.19/0.74 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.19/0.74 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.19/0.74 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.19/0.74 % axioms.
% 0.19/0.74 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.74 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.74 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.74 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.74 ( ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.19/0.74 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 cnf(cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.74 c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y ).
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.74 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.74 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.74 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.74 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.19/0.74 %VarNum:6(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.19/0.74 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.19/0.74 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.19/0.74 %SharedTerms:11
% 0.19/0.74 %goalClause: 12 13
% 0.19/0.74 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.74 [12]P1(f4(a3),f2(a5),a6)
% 0.19/0.74 [13]~P1(f4(f1(f1(a3))),f7(a5),a6)
% 0.19/0.74 [11]E(f1(f1(x111)),x111)
% 0.19/0.74 [14]~P1(x141,f2(x142),a6)+P1(x141,f7(x142),a6)
% 0.19/0.74 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.74 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.19/0.74 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.19/0.74 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.19/0.74 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41),f1(x42))
% 0.19/0.74 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x51),f2(x52))
% 0.19/0.74 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61),f4(x62))
% 0.19/0.74 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x71),f7(x72))
% 0.19/0.74 [8]P1(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83,x84)
% 0.19/0.74 [9]P1(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91,x94)
% 0.19/0.74 [10]P1(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x104,x101)
% 0.19/0.74
% 0.19/0.74 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.75 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.75 (~E(f4(a3),f4(f1(f1(a3))))),
% 0.19/0.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,13,11,2,14,10,8])).
% 0.19/0.75 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.75 (E(f1(f1(x211)),x211)),
% 0.19/0.75 inference(rename_variables,[],[11])).
% 0.19/0.75 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.75 (E(f4(f1(f1(x221))),f4(x221))),
% 0.19/0.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,13,11,21,2,14,10,8,7,6])).
% 0.19/0.75 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.19/0.75 ($false),
% 0.19/0.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[22,19,2]),
% 0.19/0.75 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.75 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.75 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------