TSTP Solution File: SWV278-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.51s 1.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 9 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 6 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 5 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 (; 6 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > #nlpp > c_Message_Oparts > c_Message_Omsg_OKey > c_Message_OinvKey > c_Message_Oanalz > v_K_H > v_H > tc_Message_Omsg
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Message_Oanalz,type,
c_Message_Oanalz: $i > $i ).
tff(v_K_H,type,
v_K_H: $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(tc_Message_Omsg,type,
tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oparts,type,
c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i ).
tff(v_H,type,
v_H: $i ).
tff(c_Message_OinvKey,type,
c_Message_OinvKey: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,type,
c_Message_Omsg_OKey: $i > $i ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_33,axiom,
! [V_X,V_H] :
( ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_35,axiom,
! [V_y] : ( c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_27,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_27,plain,
! [V_X_5,V_H_6] :
( c_in(V_X_5,c_Message_Oparts(V_H_6),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(V_X_5,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H_6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
! [V_y_3] : ( c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y_3)) = V_y_3 ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).
tff(c_9,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_2]) ).
tff(c_30,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_9]) ).
tff(c_34,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_30]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 22:59:09 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.51/1.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/1.61
% 2.51/1.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.64/1.63
% 2.64/1.63 Inference rules
% 2.64/1.63 ----------------------
% 2.64/1.63 #Ref : 0
% 2.64/1.63 #Sup : 5
% 2.64/1.63 #Fact : 0
% 2.64/1.63 #Define : 0
% 2.64/1.63 #Split : 0
% 2.64/1.63 #Chain : 0
% 2.64/1.63 #Close : 0
% 2.64/1.63
% 2.64/1.63 Ordering : KBO
% 2.64/1.63
% 2.64/1.63 Simplification rules
% 2.64/1.63 ----------------------
% 2.64/1.63 #Subsume : 0
% 2.64/1.63 #Demod : 2
% 2.64/1.63 #Tautology : 4
% 2.64/1.63 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.64/1.63 #BackRed : 0
% 2.64/1.63
% 2.64/1.63 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.64/1.63 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.64/1.63
% 2.64/1.63 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.64/1.63 ----------------------
% 2.64/1.64 Preprocessing : 0.39
% 2.64/1.64 Parsing : 0.21
% 2.64/1.64 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.64/1.64 Main loop : 0.14
% 2.64/1.64 Inferencing : 0.07
% 2.64/1.64 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.64/1.64 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.64/1.64 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.64/1.64 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.64/1.64 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.64/1.64 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.64/1.64 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.64/1.64 Total : 0.58
% 2.64/1.64 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.64/1.64 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.64/1.64 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.64/1.64 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------