TSTP Solution File: SWV277-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV277-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWV277-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 05:07:30 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.51/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.52/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.52/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % File : SWV277-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.52/0.60 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.52/0.60 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for events
% 0.52/0.60 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.52/0.60 % English :
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.60 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.52/0.60 % Names :
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.52/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of literals : 8 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.52/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.52/0.60 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.52/0.60 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.52/0.60 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.52/0.60 % axioms.
% 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(cls_Message_OkeysFor__mono_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ( ~ c_lessequals(V_G,V_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
% 0.52/0.60 | c_lessequals(c_Message_OkeysFor(V_G),c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H),tc_set(tc_nat)) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ( ~ c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)
% 0.52/0.60 | ~ c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a))
% 0.52/0.60 | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.52/0.60 ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(v_H)),tc_nat) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.52/0.60 c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_nat) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.52/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.60 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.52/0.60 %VarNum:15(SingletonVarNum:7)
% 0.52/0.60 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.52/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.52/0.60 %SharedTerms:12
% 0.52/0.60 %goalClause: 1 3
% 0.52/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.52/0.60 [1]P1(a1,f4(f3(a2)),a5)
% 0.52/0.60 [3]~P1(a1,f4(f6(a2)),a5)
% 0.52/0.60 [2]P2(f3(x21),f6(x21),f8(a7))
% 0.52/0.60 [4]~P2(x41,x42,f8(a7))+P2(f4(x41),f4(x42),f8(a5))
% 0.52/0.60 [5]P1(x51,x52,x53)+~P1(x51,x54,x53)+~P2(x54,x52,f8(x53))
% 0.52/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(7,plain,
% 0.52/0.60 ($false),
% 0.52/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,2,4,5]),
% 0.52/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------