TSTP Solution File: SWV276-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWV276-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:20:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.73s 1.96s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV276-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:19:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.73/1.93  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.73/1.93  The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 1.73/1.93  Wed Jul 27 06:19:20 2022
% 1.73/1.93  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 30731.
% 1.73/1.93  
% 1.73/1.93  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.73/1.93  set(auto).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.73/1.93  clear(print_given).
% 1.73/1.93  
% 1.73/1.93  list(usable).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] A=A.
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Osynth(V_H)),tc_nat)|c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H),tc_nat)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_sko__uhi(V_H,V_K)),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Osynth(V_H)),tc_nat)|c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H),tc_nat)|V_K=c_Message_OinvKey(v_sko__uhi(V_H,V_K)).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_lesse_quals(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y))=V_y.
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_lesse_quals(V_G,V_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_lesse_quals(c_Message_OkeysFor(V_G),c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H),tc_set(tc_nat)).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_Message_OkeysFor(c_union(V_H,V_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H),c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H_H),tc_nat).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H))=c_Message_Oparts(V_H).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_X,V_G,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_lesse_quals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(V_G),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(V_H))=c_union(c_Message_Oparts(V_H),c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_Message_Oparts(c_union(V_G,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_Oparts(V_G),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)| -c_lesse_quals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a))|c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a)|c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)|c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)|c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)|c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat).
% 1.73/1.93  0 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  end_of_list.
% 1.73/1.93  
% 1.73/1.93  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.73/1.93  
% 1.73/1.93  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.73/1.93  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.73/1.93  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.73/1.93  clauses in usable.
% 1.73/1.93  
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.73/1.93     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.73/1.93  
% 1.73/1.93  ------------> process usable:
% 1.73/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 1 [] -c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Osynth(B)),tc_nat)|c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(B),tc_nat)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_sko__uhi(B,A)),B,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 3 [copy,2,flip.3] -c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Osynth(B)),tc_nat)|c_in(A,c_Message_OkeysFor(B),tc_nat)|c_Message_OinvKey(v_sko__uhi(B,A))=A.
% 1.73/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 4 [] -c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 5 [] -c_lesse_quals(A,B,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_lesse_quals(c_Message_OkeysFor(A),c_Message_OkeysFor(B),tc_set(tc_nat)).
% 1.73/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 6 [] -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_lesse_quals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(A,C,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 7 [] -c_in(A,B,C)| -c_lesse_quals(B,D,tc_set(C))|c_in(A,D,C).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 8 [] -c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|c_in(A,B,D).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 9 [] -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(B,D,C),C).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(D,B,C),C).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 11 [] -c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 12 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  ------------> process sos:
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 14 [] A=A.
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 15 [] c_lesse_quals(c_Message_Oanalz(A),c_Message_Oparts(A),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 16 [] c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(A))=A.
% 1.73/1.96  ---> New Demodulator: 17 [new_demod,16] c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(A))=A.
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 18 [] c_Message_OkeysFor(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_OkeysFor(A),c_Message_OkeysFor(B),tc_nat).
% 1.73/1.96  ---> New Demodulator: 19 [new_demod,18] c_Message_OkeysFor(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_OkeysFor(A),c_Message_OkeysFor(B),tc_nat).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 20 [] c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(A))=c_Message_Oparts(A).
% 1.73/1.96  ---> New Demodulator: 21 [new_demod,20] c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(A))=c_Message_Oparts(A).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 22 [] c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(A))=c_union(c_Message_Oparts(A),c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.96  ---> New Demodulator: 23 [new_demod,22] c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(A))=c_union(c_Message_Oparts(A),c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 24 [] c_Message_Oparts(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_Oparts(A),c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.96  ---> New Demodulator: 25 [new_demod,24] c_Message_Oparts(c_union(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg))=c_union(c_Message_Oparts(A),c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 26 [] c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat).
% 1.73/1.96  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 27 [] c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.73/1.96    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [copy,14,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.73/1.96  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 17.
% 1.73/1.96  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 19.
% 1.73/1.96  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 21.
% 1.73/1.96  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 23.
% 1.73/1.96  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 25.
% 1.73/1.96      >> back demodulating 11 with 25.
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  sos_size=146
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  ============ end of search ============
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.73/1.96  clauses given                209
% 1.73/1.96  clauses generated           1619
% 1.73/1.96  clauses kept                 221
% 1.73/1.96  clauses forward subsumed     128
% 1.73/1.96  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.73/1.96  Kbytes malloced             5859
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.73/1.96  user CPU time          0.03          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.73/1.96  system CPU time        0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.73/1.96  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.73/1.96  
% 1.73/1.96  Process 30731 finished Wed Jul 27 06:19:22 2022
% 1.73/1.96  Otter interrupted
% 1.73/1.96  PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------