TSTP Solution File: SWV274-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV274-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 2 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Osynth(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Osynth__trans_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Osynth(Y),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(Y,c_Message_Osynth(Z),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_in(X,c_Message_Osynth(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth__trans_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OinsertE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_insert(Y,Z,U),U)
| c_in(X,Z,U)
| X = Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X,Y,Z),X,Z)
| c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X,Y,Z),Y,Z)
| c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(12,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Osynth__trans_0,cls_conjecture_0,cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,12]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,cls_Set_OsubsetI_0]) ).
cnf(28,plain,
~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0,17]) ).
cnf(35,plain,
c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OinsertE_0,18,28]) ).
cnf(36,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[17,cls_conjecture_1,35,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV274-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 15:39:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 "."
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T15:39:37
% 0.20/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n026.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T15:39:37
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 #||
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 ||#
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.52 ; 51 formulas have been input or derived (from 22 formulas).
% 0.20/0.52 ; 36 (71%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.20/0.52 ; 3 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.52 ; 33 (92%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.52 ;
% 0.20/0.52 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.002 6% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.001 3% Assert (8 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.002 6% Process new row (36 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.005 15% Resolution (42 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.001 3% Paramodulation (21 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (2 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (13 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (13 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (13 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (2 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Forward simplification (36 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.001 3% Backward simplification (36 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.021 64% Other
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.033 Total
% 0.20/0.52 ; 0.036 Real time
% 0.20/0.52 ;
% 0.20/0.52 ; Term-hash-array has 69 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 13 entries (13 at peak, 13 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 120 nodes (120 at peak, 120 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52 ; Retrieved 1 possibly forward subsuming row in 13 calls.
% 0.20/0.52 ; Retrieved 1 possibly backward subsumed row in 13 calls.
% 0.20/0.52 ; Path-index has 70 entries (73 at peak, 73 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52 ; Path-index has 247 nodes (247 at peak, 247 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52 ; Trie-index has 70 entries (73 at peak, 73 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52 ; Trie-index has 303 nodes (315 at peak, 315 added, 12 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52 ; Retrieved 1 generalization term in 36 calls.
% 0.20/0.52 ; Retrieved 22 instance terms in 22 calls.
% 0.20/0.52 ; Retrieved 240 unifiable terms in 212 calls.
% 0.20/0.52 ;
% 0.20/0.52 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.20/0.52 ; 2 with value 0
% 0.20/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.20/0.52 ; 1 with value 21 1 with value 30
% 0.20/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to give has 14 entries:
% 0.20/0.52 ; 1 with value (4 17) 1 with value (4 22) 1 with value (4 27)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 1 with value (4 19) 2 with value (4 23) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 2 with value (4 20) 1 with value (4 25) 1 with value (4 30)
% 0.20/0.52 ; 1 with value (4 21) 1 with value (4 26) 1 with value (4 33)
% 0.20/0.52 Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.52 0.036 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.52 0.032599 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.52 0.003343 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.52 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.52 0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.52 2,608,320 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.52 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T15:39:37
% 0.20/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.52 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------