TSTP Solution File: SWV274-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWV274-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:20:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.67s 2.85s
% Output   : Refutation 2.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   9 unt;   5 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (   2 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lesse_quals(B,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,c_insert(B,C,D),D)
    | c_in(A,C,D)
    | A = B ),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),B,C)
    | c_lesse_quals(A,B,tc_set(C)) ),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),A,C)
    | c_lesse_quals(A,B,tc_set(C)) ),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV274-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg),c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,2,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,2,8')] ).

cnf(1084,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[39,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,39,5')] ).

cnf(1102,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1084,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,1084,3')] ).

cnf(2764,plain,
    ( c_lesse_quals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1102,4]),9]),
    [iquote('para_from,1102.2.1,4.1.1,unit_del,9')] ).

cnf(3233,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[2764,2,8]),5]),
    [iquote('hyper,2764,2,8,unit_del,5')] ).

cnf(3234,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3233,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,3233,1')] ).

cnf(3243,plain,
    c_lesse_quals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3234,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,3234,4')] ).

cnf(3262,plain,
    c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3243,2,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,3243,2,8')] ).

cnf(3263,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[3262,5]),
    [iquote('binary,3262.1,5.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SWV274-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:03:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.67/2.85  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.67/2.85  The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 2.67/2.85  Wed Jul 27 06:03:23 2022
% 2.67/2.85  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 16707.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.67/2.85  set(auto).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.67/2.85  clear(print_given).
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  list(usable).
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] A=A.
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] -c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] -c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(V_G),tc_Message_Omsg)| -c_lesse_quals(V_G,c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] -c_in(V_a,c_insert(V_b,V_A,T_a),T_a)|c_in(V_a,V_A,T_a)|V_a=V_b.
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(V_A,V_B,T_a),V_A,T_a)|c_lesse_quals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a)).
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] -c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(V_A,V_B,T_a),V_B,T_a)|c_lesse_quals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a)).
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  0 [] -c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  end_of_list.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 2.67/2.85  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 2.67/2.85  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 2.67/2.85  clauses in usable.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.67/2.85     dependent: set(factor).
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  ------------> process usable:
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 1 [] -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 2 [] -c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg)| -c_lesse_quals(B,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 3 [] -c_in(A,c_insert(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|A=B.
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 4 [] -c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),B,C)|c_lesse_quals(A,B,tc_set(C)).
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 5 [] -c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  ------------> process sos:
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 6 [] A=A.
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 7 [] c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),A,C)|c_lesse_quals(A,B,tc_set(C)).
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 9 [] c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 2.67/2.85    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] A=A.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  Resetting weight limit to 24.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  Resetting weight limit to 24.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  sos_size=2929
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.93 sec ----> 3263 [binary,3262.1,5.1] $F.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 8.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.67/2.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.67/2.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.67/2.85  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  ============ end of search ============
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.67/2.85  clauses given                227
% 2.67/2.85  clauses generated           4797
% 2.67/2.85  clauses kept                3262
% 2.67/2.85  clauses forward subsumed    1383
% 2.67/2.85  clauses back subsumed        106
% 2.67/2.85  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.67/2.85  user CPU time          0.93          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.67/2.85  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.67/2.85  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.67/2.85  
% 2.67/2.85  Process 16707 finished Wed Jul 27 06:03:25 2022
% 2.67/2.85  Otter interrupted
% 2.67/2.85  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------