TSTP Solution File: SWV273-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV273-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.48s 9.67s
% Output : Refutation 9.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(u),c_Message_Oparts(v),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('SWV273-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
c_lessequals(u,c_Message_Osynth(u),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('SWV273-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('SWV273-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(116,axiom,
c_lessequals(u,u,tc_set(v)),
file('SWV273-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2651,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w))
| ~ c_lessequals(x,v,tc_set(w))
| c_lessequals(c_union(u,x,w),v,tc_set(w)) ),
file('SWV273-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2818,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(u),c_Message_Oparts(v),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(u,c_Message_Oparts(v),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('SWV273-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3028,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2651,4]),
[iquote('0:Res:2651.2,4.0')] ).
cnf(33482,plain,
c_lessequals(u,c_Message_Oparts(u),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[116,2818]),
[iquote('0:Res:116.0,2818.0')] ).
cnf(33486,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[3028,33482]),
[iquote('0:MRR:3028.1,33482.0')] ).
cnf(33533,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,33486]),
[iquote('0:Res:2.1,33486.0')] ).
cnf(33534,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[33533,3]),
[iquote('0:MRR:33533.0,3.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWV273-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:58:15 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 9.48/9.67
% 9.48/9.67 SPASS V 3.9
% 9.48/9.67 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 9.48/9.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 9.48/9.67 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.48/9.67 SPASS derived 24728 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 6472 clauses.
% 9.48/9.67 SPASS allocated 97053 KBytes.
% 9.48/9.67 SPASS spent 0:00:09.00 on the problem.
% 9.48/9.67 0:00:00.26 for the input.
% 9.48/9.67 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 9.48/9.67 0:00:00.55 for inferences.
% 9.48/9.67 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 9.48/9.67 0:00:07.51 for the reduction.
% 9.48/9.67
% 9.48/9.67
% 9.48/9.67 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 11 :
% 9.48/9.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 9.48/9.67 Formulae used in the proof : cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0 cls_Message_Osynth__increasing_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_2 cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0
% 9.48/9.67
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------