TSTP Solution File: SWV272-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV272-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.80s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 8 unt; 5 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X3,X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_2,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_1,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody_0) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X3,X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4) ),
cls_Set_OUn__iff_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
cls_Set_OUn__iff_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
cls_Set_OUn__iff_1 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oparts_OBody_0 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.33 % Problem : SWV272-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.34 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.34/0.55 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.34/0.55 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.34/0.55 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.34/0.55 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.34/0.55 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.34/0.55 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.34/0.55 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.34/0.55 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:31:37 EDT 2023
% 0.34/0.55 % CPUTime :
% 0.53/0.95 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.53/0.95 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UA9TVrWxS3/E---3.1_9878.p
% 0.80/1.18 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.80/1.18 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.80/1.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # new_bool_1 with pid 9968 completed with status 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.80/1.18 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.80/1.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.80/1.18 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.80/1.18 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 9971 completed with status 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.80/1.18 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.80/1.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.80/1.18 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.80/1.18 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.80/1.18 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.18 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.80/1.18
% 0.80/1.18 # Proof found!
% 0.80/1.18 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.80/1.18 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.80/1.18 # Parsed axioms : 2828
% 0.80/1.18 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2248
% 0.80/1.18 # Initial clauses : 580
% 0.80/1.18 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Initial clauses in saturation : 580
% 0.80/1.18 # Processed clauses : 645
% 0.80/1.18 # ...of these trivial : 17
% 0.80/1.18 # ...subsumed : 88
% 0.80/1.18 # ...remaining for further processing : 540
% 0.80/1.18 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.80/1.18 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.80/1.18 # Generated clauses : 3527
% 0.80/1.18 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2699
% 0.80/1.18 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.80/1.18 # Paramodulations : 3501
% 0.80/1.18 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # NegExts : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Equation resolutions : 26
% 0.80/1.18 # Total rewrite steps : 1133
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.18 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.18 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.18 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.18 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.18 # Current number of processed clauses : 530
% 0.80/1.18 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 107
% 0.80/1.18 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.80/1.18 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 0.80/1.18 # Non-unit-clauses : 402
% 0.80/1.18 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2631
% 0.80/1.18 # ...number of literals in the above : 10196
% 0.80/1.18 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.80/1.18 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62884
% 0.80/1.18 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15288
% 0.80/1.18 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 59
% 0.80/1.18 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 857
% 0.80/1.18 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # BW rewrite match attempts : 39
% 0.80/1.18 # BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.80/1.18 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.80/1.18 # Termbank termtop insertions : 94222
% 0.80/1.18
% 0.80/1.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.80/1.18 # User time : 0.150 s
% 0.80/1.18 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.80/1.18 # Total time : 0.159 s
% 0.80/1.18 # Maximum resident set size: 4524 pages
% 0.80/1.18
% 0.80/1.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.80/1.18 # User time : 0.206 s
% 0.80/1.18 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.80/1.18 # Total time : 0.215 s
% 0.80/1.18 # Maximum resident set size: 3536 pages
% 0.80/1.18 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.80/1.18 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------