TSTP Solution File: SWV271-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWV271-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:56:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.46s 0.55s
% Output : Refutation 1.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 50 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 44 ( 20 ~; 22 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f38,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f24,f27,f37]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f36]) ).
fof(f36,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f30,f28]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f22,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X0] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X3,X6,X4,X5] :
( c_in(X3,c_union(X4,X5,X6),X6)
| ~ c_in(X3,X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).
fof(f29,plain,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f4,f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_0) ).
fof(f27,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f26]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f9]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f7,f2]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X3,X6,X4,X5] :
( c_in(X3,c_union(X4,X5,X6),X6)
| ~ c_in(X3,X4,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_1) ).
fof(f25,plain,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f23,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f21,f17]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f6,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X3,X6,X4,X5] :
( ~ c_in(X3,c_union(X4,X5,X6),X6)
| c_in(X3,X5,X6)
| c_in(X3,X4,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV271-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:12:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.53 % (24015)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.37/0.54 % (24023)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 1.37/0.54 % (24005)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.37/0.54 % (24008)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.37/0.54 % (24004)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 1.37/0.54 % (24004)First to succeed.
% 1.37/0.54 % (24000)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.37/0.55 % (24003)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.37/0.55 % (24021)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 1.37/0.55 TRYING [1]
% 1.37/0.55 % (24019)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 1.37/0.55 TRYING [2]
% 1.37/0.55 % (24012)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 1.37/0.55 % (24020)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 1.37/0.55 TRYING [3]
% 1.46/0.55 % (24009)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 1.46/0.55 % (24019)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.46/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.46/0.55 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)------------------------------
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.46/0.55
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)Time elapsed: 0.123 s
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)------------------------------
% 1.46/0.55 % (24004)------------------------------
% 1.46/0.55 % (23996)Success in time 0.192 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------