TSTP Solution File: SWV269-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV269-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SZtUzAaySJ/E---3.1_459.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_2,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SZtUzAaySJ/E---3.1_459.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SZtUzAaySJ/E---3.1_459.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
cls_Set_OUn__iff_2 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWV269-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:21:29 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.46/0.67 Running first-order model finding
% 0.46/0.67 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SZtUzAaySJ/E---3.1_459.p
% 0.50/0.75 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.50/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.50/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # new_bool_1 with pid 555 completed with status 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.50/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.50/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.50/0.75 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.50/0.75 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 557 completed with status 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.50/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.50/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.50/0.75 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.50/0.75 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.50/0.75 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 # Proof found!
% 0.50/0.75 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.50/0.75 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.50/0.75 # Parsed axioms : 2827
% 0.50/0.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2392
% 0.50/0.75 # Initial clauses : 435
% 0.50/0.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 435
% 0.50/0.75 # Processed clauses : 45
% 0.50/0.75 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.50/0.75 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.50/0.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.50/0.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.50/0.75 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.50/0.75 # Generated clauses : 28
% 0.50/0.75 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.50/0.75 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Paramodulations : 27
% 0.50/0.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # NegExts : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.50/0.75 # Total rewrite steps : 23
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.50/0.75 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.50/0.75 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.50/0.75 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.50/0.75 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.50/0.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 36
% 0.50/0.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.50/0.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.50/0.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.50/0.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 402
% 0.50/0.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 1187
% 0.50/0.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.50/0.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.50/0.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.50/0.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 0.50/0.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.50/0.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.50/0.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.50/0.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 28720
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.75 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.50/0.75 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.50/0.75 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.50/0.75 # Maximum resident set size: 4456 pages
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.75 # User time : 0.066 s
% 0.50/0.75 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.50/0.75 # Total time : 0.080 s
% 0.50/0.75 # Maximum resident set size: 3536 pages
% 0.50/0.75 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------