TSTP Solution File: SWV268-1 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 19:46:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.79s 1.98s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:56:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 9.79/1.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.79/1.98 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c1, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
% 9.79/1.98 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 9.79/1.98
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) | ~c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 v_G = X0).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(v_H) = X1).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg) = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c3, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 $false,
% 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1, a2])], [c1, c2])).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c4, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
% 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1, a2])], [c1, c2])).
% 9.79/1.98
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(X2) = c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X2))).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(X1) = c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X2))).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c6, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 $false,
% 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c7, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 $false,
% 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c8, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 X3 != c_Message_Oparts(X2) | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),X3,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
% 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 9.79/1.98
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 X3 = c_Message_Oparts(X2)).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c9, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),X3,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
% 9.79/1.98 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c8])).
% 9.79/1.98
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c10, axiom,
% 9.79/1.98 ~c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(X0) = c_Message_Oparts(v_G)).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 X3 = c_Message_Oparts(v_H)).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 9.79/1.98 tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg) = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c11, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 $false,
% 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c9, c10])).
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c12, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 $false,
% 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c9, c10])).
% 9.79/1.98
% 9.79/1.98 cnf(c13, plain,
% 9.79/1.98 $false,
% 9.79/1.98 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 9.79/1.98 bind(X0, v_G),
% 9.79/1.98 bind(X1, c_Message_Oparts(v_H)),
% 9.79/1.98 bind(X2, v_H),
% 9.79/1.98 bind(X3, c_Message_Oparts(X2))
% 9.79/1.98 ],
% 9.79/1.98 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7])).
% 9.79/1.98
% 9.79/1.98 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------