TSTP Solution File: SWV268-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZY7hrUhG0b true
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:08:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.74s 1.02s
% Output : Refutation 2.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZY7hrUhG0b true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 04:15:06 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 2.74/1.02 % Solved by fo/fo4.sh.
% 2.74/1.02 % done 86 iterations in 0.188s
% 2.74/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 2.74/1.02 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.74/1.02 thf(tc_Message_Omsg_type, type, tc_Message_Omsg: $i).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(c_Message_Oparts_type, type, c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(c_lessequals_type, type, c_lessequals: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(v_G_type, type, v_G: $i).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(tc_set_type, type, tc_set: $i > $i).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(v_H_type, type, v_H: $i).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0, axiom,
% 2.74/1.02 (( c_Message_Oparts @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ V_H ) ) =
% 2.74/1.02 ( c_Message_Oparts @ V_H ))).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 2.74/1.02 (![X0 : $i]:
% 2.74/1.02 ((c_Message_Oparts @ (c_Message_Oparts @ X0))
% 2.74/1.02 = (c_Message_Oparts @ X0))),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0, axiom,
% 2.74/1.02 (( ~( c_lessequals @ V_G @ V_H @ ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ) ) ) |
% 2.74/1.02 ( c_lessequals @
% 2.74/1.02 ( c_Message_Oparts @ V_G ) @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ V_H ) @
% 2.74/1.02 ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ) ))).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 2.74/1.02 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.74/1.02 (~ (c_lessequals @ X0 @ X1 @ (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))
% 2.74/1.02 | (c_lessequals @ (c_Message_Oparts @ X0) @
% 2.74/1.02 (c_Message_Oparts @ X1) @ (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg)))),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain,
% 2.74/1.02 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.74/1.02 ( (c_lessequals @ (c_Message_Oparts @ X1) @ (c_Message_Oparts @ X0) @
% 2.74/1.02 (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))
% 2.74/1.02 | ~ (c_lessequals @ X1 @ (c_Message_Oparts @ X0) @
% 2.74/1.02 (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg)))),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(cls_conjecture_1, conjecture,
% 2.74/1.02 (c_lessequals @
% 2.74/1.02 ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_G ) @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @
% 2.74/1.02 ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ))).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 2.74/1.02 (~( c_lessequals @
% 2.74/1.02 ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_G ) @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @
% 2.74/1.02 ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ) )),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_1])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain,
% 2.74/1.02 (~ (c_lessequals @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_G) @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_H) @
% 2.74/1.02 (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zip_derived_cl487, plain,
% 2.74/1.02 (~ (c_lessequals @ v_G @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_H) @
% 2.74/1.02 (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl56, zip_derived_cl23])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 2.74/1.02 (~( c_lessequals @
% 2.74/1.02 v_G @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @ ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ) ))).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 2.74/1.02 (c_lessequals @
% 2.74/1.02 v_G @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @ ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg )),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain,
% 2.74/1.02 ( (c_lessequals @ v_G @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_H) @
% 2.74/1.02 (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 2.74/1.02 thf(zip_derived_cl525, plain, ($false),
% 2.74/1.02 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl487, zip_derived_cl24])).
% 2.74/1.02
% 2.74/1.02 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.74/1.02
% 2.74/1.02
% 2.74/1.02 % Terminating...
% 2.74/1.09 % Runner terminated.
% 2.74/1.11 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------