TSTP Solution File: SWV268-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 2 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gnoyzBMvFf/E---3.1_27493.p',cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gnoyzBMvFf/E---3.1_27493.p',cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gnoyzBMvFf/E---3.1_27493.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gnoyzBMvFf/E---3.1_27493.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.29 % Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.30 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.28/0.48 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.28/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.28/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.28/0.48 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.28/0.48 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.28/0.48 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.28/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.28/0.48 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:19:48 EDT 2023
% 0.28/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.52/0.80 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.52/0.80 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gnoyzBMvFf/E---3.1_27493.p
% 0.61/0.86 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.61/0.86 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.61/0.86 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # new_bool_1 with pid 27573 completed with status 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.61/0.86 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.61/0.86 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.61/0.86 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.61/0.86 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 27576 completed with status 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.61/0.86 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.61/0.86 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.61/0.86 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.61/0.86 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.61/0.86 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.61/0.86 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.86 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.61/0.86
% 0.61/0.86 # Proof found!
% 0.61/0.86 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.61/0.86 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.86 # Parsed axioms : 2780
% 0.61/0.86 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2583
% 0.61/0.86 # Initial clauses : 197
% 0.61/0.86 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Initial clauses in saturation : 197
% 0.61/0.86 # Processed clauses : 256
% 0.61/0.86 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.61/0.86 # ...subsumed : 25
% 0.61/0.86 # ...remaining for further processing : 225
% 0.61/0.86 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.61/0.86 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.61/0.86 # Generated clauses : 44
% 0.61/0.86 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.61/0.86 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Paramodulations : 44
% 0.61/0.86 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # NegExts : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Total rewrite steps : 35
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.61/0.86 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.61/0.86 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.61/0.86 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.61/0.86 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.61/0.86 # Current number of processed clauses : 49
% 0.61/0.86 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.61/0.86 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.61/0.86 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.61/0.86 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 126
% 0.61/0.86 # ...number of literals in the above : 234
% 0.61/0.86 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Current number of archived clauses : 176
% 0.61/0.86 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1097
% 0.61/0.86 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1056
% 0.61/0.86 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.61/0.86 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 62
% 0.61/0.86 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # BW rewrite match attempts : 45
% 0.61/0.86 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.61/0.86 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.61/0.86 # Termbank termtop insertions : 26755
% 0.61/0.86
% 0.61/0.86 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.86 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.61/0.86 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.61/0.86 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.61/0.86 # Maximum resident set size: 4316 pages
% 0.61/0.86
% 0.61/0.86 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.86 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.61/0.86 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.61/0.86 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 0.61/0.86 # Maximum resident set size: 3496 pages
% 0.61/0.86 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.61/0.86 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------