TSTP Solution File: SWV265-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV265-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:34 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OSnd_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NiBL5skB0h/E---3.1_29527.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OSnd_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NiBL5skB0h/E---3.1_29527.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NiBL5skB0h/E---3.1_29527.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    cls_Message_Oparts_OSnd_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV265-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:26:20 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.60  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NiBL5skB0h/E---3.1_29527.p
% 0.20/0.65  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # new_bool_1 with pid 29723 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.65  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.65  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 29729 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.20/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.65  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.65  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.65  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.65  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 1381
% 0.20/0.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 992
% 0.20/0.65  # Initial clauses                      : 389
% 0.20/0.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 389
% 0.20/0.65  # Processed clauses                    : 112
% 0.20/0.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.20/0.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 110
% 0.20/0.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.20/0.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.65  # Generated clauses                    : 12
% 0.20/0.65  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.20/0.65  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Paramodulations                      : 8
% 0.20/0.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.20/0.65  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.20/0.65  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.65  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.65  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.65  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.65  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 107
% 0.20/0.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 36
% 0.20/0.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.20/0.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 66
% 0.20/0.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 278
% 0.20/0.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 557
% 0.20/0.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.20/0.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 667
% 0.20/0.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 619
% 0.20/0.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.20/0.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.20/0.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.20/0.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10265
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.65  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.65  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 3024 pages
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  # User time                : 0.032 s
% 0.20/0.65  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.65  # Total time               : 0.041 s
% 0.20/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 2412 pages
% 0.20/0.65  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------