TSTP Solution File: SWV263-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV263-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV263-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 07:27:59 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % File : SWV263-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.19/0.62 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.19/0.62 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for messages
% 0.19/0.62 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.62 % English :
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.62 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.19/0.62 % Names :
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.19/0.62 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of literals : 8 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.19/0.62 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.62 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.19/0.62 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.19/0.62 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.19/0.62 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.19/0.62 % axioms.
% 0.19/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.62 c_lessequals(v_G,v_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.62 c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.62 ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( ~ c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.19/0.62 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( ~ c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)
% 0.19/0.62 | ~ c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a))
% 0.19/0.62 | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.62 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.62 %VarNum:13(SingletonVarNum:6)
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.62 %SharedTerms:9
% 0.19/0.62 %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.19/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.19/0.62 [1]P1(a1,a2,a3)
% 0.19/0.62 [2]P2(a2,a6,f5(a3))
% 0.19/0.62 [3]~P1(a1,f4(a6),a3)
% 0.19/0.62 [4]~P1(x41,x42,a3)+P1(x41,f4(x42),a3)
% 0.19/0.63 [5]P1(x51,x52,x53)+~P1(x51,x54,x53)+~P2(x54,x52,f5(x53))
% 0.19/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(7,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 ($false),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4,5]),
% 0.19/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------