TSTP Solution File: SWV263-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV263-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UycZ1G5d0Q/E---3.1_18419.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UycZ1G5d0Q/E---3.1_18419.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UycZ1G5d0Q/E---3.1_18419.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,v_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UycZ1G5d0Q/E---3.1_18419.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UycZ1G5d0Q/E---3.1_18419.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
cls_Set_OsubsetD_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,v_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(X1,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.23 % Problem : SWV263-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.24 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.25/0.46 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.25/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.25/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.25/0.46 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.25/0.46 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.25/0.46 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.25/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.25/0.46 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:09:46 EDT 2023
% 0.25/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.71 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.44/0.71 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UycZ1G5d0Q/E---3.1_18419.p
% 0.57/0.78 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.57/0.78 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.78 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # new_bool_3 with pid 18502 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.57/0.78 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.78 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.78 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.78 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 18505 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.57/0.78 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.78 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.78 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.78 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.57/0.78 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.57/0.78
% 0.57/0.78 # Proof found!
% 0.57/0.78 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.57/0.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.78 # Parsed axioms : 1380
% 0.57/0.78 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 992
% 0.57/0.78 # Initial clauses : 388
% 0.57/0.78 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Initial clauses in saturation : 388
% 0.57/0.78 # Processed clauses : 402
% 0.57/0.78 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # ...subsumed : 12
% 0.57/0.78 # ...remaining for further processing : 390
% 0.57/0.78 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.57/0.78 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.57/0.78 # Generated clauses : 144
% 0.57/0.78 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 84
% 0.57/0.78 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Paramodulations : 139
% 0.57/0.78 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # NegExts : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 0.57/0.78 # Total rewrite steps : 53
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.78 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.78 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.78 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.78 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.78 # Current number of processed clauses : 386
% 0.57/0.78 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.57/0.78 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.57/0.78 # Non-unit-clauses : 343
% 0.57/0.78 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70
% 0.57/0.78 # ...number of literals in the above : 139
% 0.57/0.78 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.57/0.78 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18877
% 0.57/0.78 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18202
% 0.57/0.78 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.57/0.78 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125
% 0.57/0.78 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.57/0.78 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.57/0.78 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/0.78 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12715
% 0.57/0.78
% 0.57/0.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.78 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.57/0.78 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.57/0.78 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.57/0.78 # Maximum resident set size: 3020 pages
% 0.57/0.78
% 0.57/0.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.78 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.57/0.78 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.57/0.78 # Total time : 0.055 s
% 0.57/0.78 # Maximum resident set size: 2412 pages
% 0.57/0.78 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.57/0.78 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------