TSTP Solution File: SWV262-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV262-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.79s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   9 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_insert(v_Y,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)) != c_union(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_Y,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sqDlJMVIp5/E---3.1_27769.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__insert_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sqDlJMVIp5/E---3.1_27769.p',cls_Message_Oparts__insert_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUn__assoc_0,axiom,
    c_union(c_union(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3) = c_union(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sqDlJMVIp5/E---3.1_27769.p',cls_Set_OUn__assoc_0) ).

cnf(cls_Datatype_Oo2s_Osimps__2_0,axiom,
    c_Datatype_Oo2s(c_Datatype_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sqDlJMVIp5/E---3.1_27769.p',cls_Datatype_Oo2s_Osimps__2_0) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_insert(v_Y,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)) != c_union(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_Y,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_Message_Oparts__insert_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    c_union(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_Y,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) != c_union(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_Y,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    c_union(c_union(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3) = c_union(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3),
    cls_Set_OUn__assoc_0 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    c_Datatype_Oo2s(c_Datatype_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,X2),
    cls_Datatype_Oo2s_Osimps__2_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.32  % Problem    : SWV262-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.33  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.33/0.55  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.33/0.55  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.33/0.55  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.33/0.55  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.33/0.55  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.33/0.55  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.33/0.55  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.33/0.55  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:05:39 EDT 2023
% 0.33/0.55  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.76/0.95  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.76/0.95  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sqDlJMVIp5/E---3.1_27769.p
% 0.79/1.17  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.79/1.17  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.79/1.17  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 27941 completed with status 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.79/1.17  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.79/1.17  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.79/1.17  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.79/1.17  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with pid 27952 completed with status 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Result found by G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN
% 0.79/1.17  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.79/1.17  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.79/1.17  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.79/1.17  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.79/1.17  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 0.79/1.17  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.79/1.17  
% 0.79/1.17  # Proof found!
% 0.79/1.17  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.79/1.17  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.79/1.17  # Parsed axioms                        : 2775
% 0.79/1.17  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Initial clauses                      : 2775
% 0.79/1.17  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 0.79/1.17  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2766
% 0.79/1.17  # Processed clauses                    : 1806
% 0.79/1.17  # ...of these trivial                  : 20
% 0.79/1.17  # ...subsumed                          : 58
% 0.79/1.17  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1728
% 0.79/1.17  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.79/1.17  # Backward-rewritten                   : 25
% 0.79/1.17  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.79/1.17  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Total rewrite steps                  : 109
% 0.79/1.17  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.79/1.17  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.79/1.17  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.79/1.17  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.79/1.17  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.79/1.17  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1700
% 0.79/1.17  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 398
% 0.79/1.17  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.79/1.17  #    Negative unit clauses             : 32
% 0.79/1.17  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1267
% 0.79/1.17  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 974
% 0.79/1.17  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2791
% 0.79/1.17  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Current number of archived clauses   : 36
% 0.79/1.17  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 556928
% 0.79/1.17  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 480927
% 0.79/1.17  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 40
% 0.79/1.17  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40019
% 0.79/1.17  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 121
% 0.79/1.17  # BW rewrite match successes           : 29
% 0.79/1.17  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.79/1.17  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 56978
% 0.79/1.17  
% 0.79/1.17  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/1.17  # User time                : 0.139 s
% 0.79/1.17  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.79/1.17  # Total time               : 0.155 s
% 0.79/1.17  # Maximum resident set size: 6372 pages
% 0.79/1.17  
% 0.79/1.17  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/1.17  # User time                : 0.628 s
% 0.79/1.17  # System time              : 0.055 s
% 0.79/1.17  # Total time               : 0.683 s
% 0.79/1.17  # Maximum resident set size: 3496 pages
% 0.79/1.17  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.79/1.17  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------