TSTP Solution File: SWV260-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV260-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.65s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  15 unt;   5 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   3 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
    | c_in(X,c_union(U,Y,Z),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
    | c_in(X,c_union(Y,U,Z),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OinsertE_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_insert(Y,Z,U),U)
    | c_in(X,Z,U)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X,Y,Z),X,Z)
    | c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X,Y,Z),Y,Z)
    | c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__trans_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(Y,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__trans_0) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts__trans_0,cls_conjecture_0,cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(X),tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(X),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts__trans_0,cls_conjecture_1,cls_Set_OsubsetI_0]) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[18,cls_Set_OsubsetI_0]) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,18]) ).

cnf(111,plain,
    ( c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(X),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(X),tc_Message_Omsg),c_union(Y,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0,19]) ).

cnf(286,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OinsertE_0,62]) ).

cnf(390,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,63]) ).

cnf(480,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1,390]) ).

cnf(481,plain,
    c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[286,480]) ).

cnf(483,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[63,481,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(490,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts__trans_0,483,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(500,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_union(X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[111,483]) ).

cnf(543,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,490]) ).

cnf(593,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,500]) ).

cnf(594,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[543,593]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV260-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 10:21:51 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  "."
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T10:21:51
% 0.21/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T10:21:51
% 0.48/0.65  
% 0.48/0.65  
% 0.48/0.65  #||
% 0.48/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.65  ||#
% 0.48/0.65  
% 0.48/0.65  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.48/0.65  ;      1031 formulas have been input or derived (from 171 formulas).
% 0.48/0.65  ;       594 (58%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.48/0.65  ;           10 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.48/0.65  ;          584 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.48/0.65  ; 
% 0.48/0.65  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.002   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (10 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.055  34%   Process new row              (884 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.025  16%   Resolution                   (340 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.003   2%   Paramodulation               (170 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (8 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.001   1%   Condensing                   (98 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.010   6%   Forward subsumption          (98 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.003   2%   Backward subsumption         (98 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (221 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.022  14%   Forward simplification       (884 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.007   4%   Backward simplification      (594 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (117 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.030  19%   Other
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.160        Total
% 0.48/0.65  ;     0.163        Real time
% 0.48/0.65  ; 
% 0.48/0.65  ; Term-hash-array has 1,199 terms in all.
% 0.48/0.65  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 97 entries (97 at peak, 98 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 554 nodes (554 at peak, 580 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65  ;  Retrieved 140 possibly forward subsuming rows in 98 calls.
% 0.48/0.65  ;  Retrieved 81 possibly backward subsumed rows in 98 calls.
% 0.48/0.65  ; Path-index has 1,195 entries (1,196 at peak, 1,207 added, 12 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65  ; Path-index has 4,460 nodes (4,460 at peak, 4,480 added, 20 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65  ; Trie-index has 1,195 entries (1,196 at peak, 1,207 added, 12 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65  ; Trie-index has 7,793 nodes (7,797 at peak, 7,864 added, 71 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65  ; Retrieved 289 generalization terms in 1,018 calls.
% 0.48/0.65  ; Retrieved 496 instance terms in 495 calls.
% 0.48/0.65  ; Retrieved 2,928 unifiable terms in 2,427 calls.
% 0.48/0.65  ; 
% 0.48/0.65  ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.48/0.65  ;     4 with value 25
% 0.48/0.65  ; The agenda of rows to give has 416 entries:
% 0.48/0.65  ;     5 with value (4 21)         66 with value (4 28)           4 with value (4 36)
% 0.48/0.65  ;    11 with value (4 22)         48 with value (4 29)           4 with value (4 37)
% 0.48/0.65  ;     9 with value (4 23)          4 with value (4 30)          11 with value (4 38)
% 0.48/0.65  ;    15 with value (4 24)          3 with value (4 31)           5 with value (4 41)
% 0.48/0.65  ;    57 with value (4 25)          3 with value (4 32)          20 with value (4 42)
% 0.48/0.65  ;    60 with value (4 26)          2 with value (4 33)           4 with value (4 45)
% 0.48/0.65  ;    75 with value (4 27)         10 with value (4 34)
% 0.48/0.65  Evaluation took:
% 0.48/0.65    0.164 seconds of real time
% 0.48/0.65    0.14415 seconds of user run time
% 0.48/0.65    0.019694 seconds of system run time
% 0.48/0.65    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.48/0.65    0 page faults and
% 0.48/0.65    11,888,360 bytes consed.
% 0.48/0.65  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.48/0.65  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T10:21:51
% 0.48/0.65  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.48/0.65  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------