TSTP Solution File: SWV259-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV259-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 1.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WiT0Pwi2rC/E---3.1_8079.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WiT0Pwi2rC/E---3.1_8079.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WiT0Pwi2rC/E---3.1_8079.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WiT0Pwi2rC/E---3.1_8079.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_1,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WiT0Pwi2rC/E---3.1_8079.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.34 % Problem : SWV259-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.35 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.35/0.56 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.35/0.56 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.35/0.56 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.35/0.56 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.35/0.56 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.35/0.56 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.35/0.56 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.35/0.56 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:06:07 EDT 2023
% 0.35/0.56 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/0.99 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.41/0.99 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WiT0Pwi2rC/E---3.1_8079.p
% 0.41/1.08 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.41/1.08 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/1.08 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # new_bool_3 with pid 8159 completed with status 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.41/1.08 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/1.08 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/1.08 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/1.08 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 8162 completed with status 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.41/1.08 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/1.08 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/1.08 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/1.08 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/1.08 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.41/1.08 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.41/1.08
% 0.41/1.08 # Proof found!
% 0.41/1.08 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/1.08 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/1.08 # Parsed axioms : 2779
% 0.41/1.08 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2491
% 0.41/1.08 # Initial clauses : 288
% 0.41/1.08 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Initial clauses in saturation : 288
% 0.41/1.08 # Processed clauses : 322
% 0.41/1.08 # ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.41/1.08 # ...subsumed : 49
% 0.41/1.08 # ...remaining for further processing : 263
% 0.41/1.08 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.41/1.08 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.41/1.08 # Generated clauses : 1379
% 0.41/1.08 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 949
% 0.41/1.08 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Paramodulations : 1364
% 0.41/1.08 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # NegExts : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Equation resolutions : 15
% 0.41/1.08 # Total rewrite steps : 509
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/1.08 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/1.08 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.41/1.08 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/1.08 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/1.08 # Current number of processed clauses : 254
% 0.41/1.08 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 79
% 0.41/1.08 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.41/1.08 # Non-unit-clauses : 163
% 0.41/1.08 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 913
% 0.41/1.08 # ...number of literals in the above : 2252
% 0.41/1.08 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.41/1.08 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5628
% 0.41/1.08 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2627
% 0.41/1.08 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 32
% 0.41/1.08 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 86
% 0.41/1.08 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # BW rewrite match attempts : 37
% 0.41/1.08 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.41/1.08 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/1.08 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41766
% 0.41/1.08
% 0.41/1.08 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/1.08 # User time : 0.038 s
% 0.41/1.08 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.41/1.08 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.41/1.08 # Maximum resident set size: 4352 pages
% 0.41/1.08
% 0.41/1.08 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/1.08 # User time : 0.074 s
% 0.41/1.08 # System time : 0.015 s
% 0.41/1.08 # Total time : 0.089 s
% 0.41/1.08 # Maximum resident set size: 3496 pages
% 0.41/1.08 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.41/1.08 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------