TSTP Solution File: SWV258-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SWV258-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 10:48:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.34s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   9   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : c_lessequals(X5,X5,tc_set(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f9,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_insert(X2,X5,X4),X3,tc_set(X4))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X5,X3,tc_set(X4))
      | ~ c_in(X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_2) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f4,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SWV258-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 20:56:22 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.32  % (19281)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.17/0.34  % (19285)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19282)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19283)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19284)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19288)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19286)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1]
% 0.17/0.34  Detected maximum model sizes of [1,max,1]
% 0.17/0.34  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1]
% 0.17/0.34  Detected maximum model sizes of [1,max,1]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [1]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [1,1,1]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [1,1,1]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [1,2,1]
% 0.17/0.34  % (19284)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)First to succeed.
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [2]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [1,2,1]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [1]
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-19281"
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [2]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [1,3,1]
% 0.17/0.34  TRYING [3]
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.34  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.34  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.34  
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)Memory used [KB]: 747
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.34  % (19287)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.17/0.34  % (19281)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------