TSTP Solution File: SWV258-2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SWV258-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:44:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 9 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 11 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f23,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f22,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X4,X5] : c_lessequals(X5,X5,tc_set(X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).
fof(f22,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f21,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(resolution,[],[f4,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( c_lessequals(c_insert(X2,X5,X4),X3,tc_set(X4))
| ~ c_lessequals(X5,X3,tc_set(X4))
| ~ c_in(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV258-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:10:33 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 % (30611)ott+2_1:64_afp=40000:bd=off:irw=on:i=8:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/8Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30601)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)Time elapsed: 0.095 s
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (30601)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fsr=off:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=67:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/67Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30615)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)Time elapsed: 0.107 s
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (30615)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)Time elapsed: 0.084 s
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (30611)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (30593)Success in time 0.155 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------