TSTP Solution File: SWV258-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV258-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV258-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:29:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Tue Jun 14 17:29:14 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 30021.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.19/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.35 in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.19/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.19/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.19/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.19/0.37 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.37 distinct function count: 3
% 0.19/0.37 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.01 sec ----> 20 [binary,19.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 1 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.19/0.39 2 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(A),c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_lessequals(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.19/0.39 3 [] {+} -c_lessequals(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(A),c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.19/0.39 4 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,C)| -c_lessequals(D,B,tc_set(C))|c_lessequals(c_insert(A,D,C),B,tc_set(C)).
% 0.19/0.39 5 [] {-} c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.19/0.39 6 [] {+} c_lessequals(A,A,tc_set(B)).
% 0.19/0.39 9 [hyper,6,2] {+} c_lessequals(A,c_Message_Oparts(A),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.19/0.39 14 [hyper,9,4,5] {-} c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.19/0.39 19 [hyper,14,3] {-} c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 0.19/0.39 20 [binary,19.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.39 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 true clauses given 2 (28.6%)
% 0.19/0.39 false clauses given 5
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 FALSE TRUE
% 0.19/0.39 7 0 1
% 0.19/0.39 9 0 1
% 0.19/0.39 11 1 0
% 0.19/0.39 12 1 0
% 0.19/0.39 13 1 0
% 0.19/0.39 14 1 0
% 0.19/0.39 tot: 4 2 (33.3% true)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Process 30021 finished Tue Jun 14 17:29:14 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------