TSTP Solution File: SWV257-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV257-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:30 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV257-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.17/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 05:41:54 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File : SWV257-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.20/0.62 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for messages
% 0.20/0.62 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.20/0.62 % English :
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.62 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.20/0.62 % Names :
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.20/0.62 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 3 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of literals : 4 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.20/0.62 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.20/0.62 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.20/0.62 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.20/0.62 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.20/0.62 % axioms.
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62 ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__increasing_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 c_lessequals(V_H,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( ~ c_lessequals(V_G,V_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
% 0.20/0.62 | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(V_G),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.62 %ClaNum:3(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.62 %VarNum:6(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.20/0.62 %SharedTerms:7
% 0.20/0.62 %goalClause: 2
% 0.20/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.62 [2]~P1(f3(a5),f3(f1(a5)),f4(a2))
% 0.20/0.62 [1]P1(x11,f1(x11),f4(a2))
% 0.20/0.62 [3]~P1(x31,x32,f4(a2))+P1(f3(x31),f3(x32),f4(a2))
% 0.20/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(4,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 ($false),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3]),
% 0.20/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------