TSTP Solution File: SWV256-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV256-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GjXFsD5hGR/E---3.1_23105.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GjXFsD5hGR/E---3.1_23105.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GjXFsD5hGR/E---3.1_23105.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10  % Problem    : SWV256-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:54:35 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.41/0.64  Running first-order model finding
% 0.41/0.64  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GjXFsD5hGR/E---3.1_23105.p
% 0.49/0.72  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.49/0.72  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.72  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # new_bool_1 with pid 23190 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.49/0.72  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.72  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.49/0.72  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.72  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 23193 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.49/0.72  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.72  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.49/0.72  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.72  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.49/0.72  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.49/0.72  
% 0.49/0.72  # Proof found!
% 0.49/0.72  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.72  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 2793
% 0.49/0.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2528
% 0.49/0.72  # Initial clauses                      : 265
% 0.49/0.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 265
% 0.49/0.72  # Processed clauses                    : 57
% 0.49/0.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.49/0.72  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.49/0.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 50
% 0.49/0.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.49/0.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.49/0.72  # Generated clauses                    : 26
% 0.49/0.72  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.49/0.72  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Paramodulations                      : 24
% 0.49/0.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.49/0.72  # Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.49/0.72  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.49/0.72  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.49/0.72  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.49/0.72  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.49/0.72  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.49/0.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 0.49/0.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
% 0.49/0.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.49/0.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.49/0.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.49/0.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 223
% 0.49/0.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 394
% 0.49/0.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.49/0.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 90
% 0.49/0.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.49/0.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.49/0.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.49/0.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.49/0.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.49/0.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.49/0.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 25714
% 0.49/0.72  
% 0.49/0.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.72  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.49/0.72  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.49/0.72  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.49/0.72  # Maximum resident set size: 4356 pages
% 0.49/0.72  
% 0.49/0.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.72  # User time                : 0.062 s
% 0.49/0.72  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.49/0.72  # Total time               : 0.074 s
% 0.49/0.72  # Maximum resident set size: 3508 pages
% 0.49/0.72  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------