TSTP Solution File: SWV256-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV256-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.98s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YsqqHDgFwC/E---3.1_20386.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YsqqHDgFwC/E---3.1_20386.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YsqqHDgFwC/E---3.1_20386.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.32/0.32 % Problem : SWV256-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.32/0.33 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.33/0.54 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.33/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.33/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.33/0.54 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.33/0.54 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.33/0.54 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.33/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.33/0.54 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:19:42 EDT 2023
% 0.33/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.92 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.40/0.92 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YsqqHDgFwC/E---3.1_20386.p
% 0.40/0.98 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.40/0.98 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/0.98 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # new_bool_3 with pid 20465 completed with status 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.40/0.98 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/0.98 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.40/0.98 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.40/0.98 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 20468 completed with status 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.40/0.98 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/0.98 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.40/0.98 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.40/0.98 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/0.98 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.98 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 # Proof found!
% 0.40/0.98 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.98 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.98 # Parsed axioms : 2793
% 0.40/0.98 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2528
% 0.40/0.98 # Initial clauses : 265
% 0.40/0.98 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Initial clauses in saturation : 265
% 0.40/0.98 # Processed clauses : 57
% 0.40/0.98 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.40/0.98 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.40/0.98 # ...remaining for further processing : 50
% 0.40/0.98 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.40/0.98 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.40/0.98 # Generated clauses : 26
% 0.40/0.98 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.40/0.98 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Paramodulations : 24
% 0.40/0.98 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # NegExts : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.40/0.98 # Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.98 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.98 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.98 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.98 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.98 # Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 0.40/0.98 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 0.40/0.98 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.40/0.98 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.40/0.98 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 223
% 0.40/0.98 # ...number of literals in the above : 394
% 0.40/0.98 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.40/0.98 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 90
% 0.40/0.98 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.40/0.98 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.40/0.98 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.40/0.98 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.40/0.98 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.40/0.98 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.40/0.98 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25714
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/0.98 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.40/0.98 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.40/0.98 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.40/0.98 # Maximum resident set size: 4348 pages
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/0.98 # User time : 0.042 s
% 0.40/0.98 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.40/0.98 # Total time : 0.056 s
% 0.40/0.98 # Maximum resident set size: 3504 pages
% 0.40/0.98 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.40/0.99 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------