TSTP Solution File: SWV251-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV251-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 89.59s 12.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 89.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (  24 unt;   4 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   74 (  12 equ;  29 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   98 (  16 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_ODiff__iff_2,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_minus(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)),X3)
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_ODiff__iff_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__iff_0,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__iff_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_ODiff__eq__empty__iff_1,axiom,
    ( c_minus(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) = c_emptyset
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_ODiff__eq__empty__iff_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Oempty__iff_0,axiom,
    ~ c_in(X1,c_emptyset,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_Oempty__iff_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_0,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_union(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUn__insert__left_0,axiom,
    c_union(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3) = c_insert(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_OUn__insert__left_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0,axiom,
    ( X2 = X1
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_2,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X4,X3),X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_2) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_1,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Ostrange__Un__eq_0,axiom,
    c_union(X1,c_union(X2,X1,X3),X3) = c_union(X2,X1,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_Message_Ostrange__Un__eq_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_minus(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)),X3)
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    cls_Set_ODiff__iff_2 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__iff_0 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_x,c_minus(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_x,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( c_minus(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) = c_emptyset
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_ODiff__eq__empty__iff_1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ~ c_in(X1,c_emptyset,X2),
    cls_Set_Oempty__iff_0 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_union(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_0 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_x,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),
    cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0 ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    c_union(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3) = c_insert(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3),
    cls_Set_OUn__insert__left_0 ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    ( X2 = X1
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0 ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X4,X3),X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_2 ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_1 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,c_union(v_H,X1,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    c_union(X1,c_union(X2,X1,X3),X3) = c_union(X2,X1,X3),
    cls_Message_Ostrange__Un__eq_0 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( X1 = c_insert(X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X4))
    | ~ c_in(X2,X1,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_insert(X2,X1,X3),tc_set(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_X,c_minus(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_X,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,c_union(X1,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( c_insert(X1,X2,X3) = X2
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_X,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X1,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(X1,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),X1,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.40  % Problem    : SWV251-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.40/0.41  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.41/0.61  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.41/0.61  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.41/0.61  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.41/0.61  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.41/0.61  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.41/0.61  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.41/0.61  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.41/0.61  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:40:05 EDT 2023
% 0.41/0.62  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.79/1.04  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.79/1.04  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G9bdPZtKUl/E---3.1_21762.p
% 89.59/12.56  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 89.59/12.56  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 89.59/12.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 21841 completed with status 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 89.59/12.56  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 89.59/12.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # No SInE strategy applied
% 89.59/12.56  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 89.59/12.56  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 21849 completed with status 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 89.59/12.56  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 89.59/12.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # No SInE strategy applied
% 89.59/12.56  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 89.59/12.56  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 89.59/12.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 89.59/12.56  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 89.59/12.56  
% 89.59/12.56  # Proof found!
% 89.59/12.56  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 89.59/12.56  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 89.59/12.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 2831
% 89.59/12.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Initial clauses                      : 2831
% 89.59/12.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 89.59/12.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2822
% 89.59/12.56  # Processed clauses                    : 53244
% 89.59/12.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 643
% 89.59/12.56  # ...subsumed                          : 40951
% 89.59/12.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11650
% 89.59/12.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 916
% 89.59/12.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1009
% 89.59/12.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 521
% 89.59/12.56  # Generated clauses                    : 309993
% 89.59/12.56  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 274595
% 89.59/12.56  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 426
% 89.59/12.56  # Paramodulations                      : 308979
% 89.59/12.56  # Factorizations                       : 21
% 89.59/12.56  # NegExts                              : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 993
% 89.59/12.56  # Total rewrite steps                  : 251180
% 89.59/12.56  # Propositional unsat checks           : 2
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional check models        : 1
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.459
% 89.59/12.56  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.306
% 89.59/12.56  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 89.59/12.56  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 89.59/12.56  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 89.59/12.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7433
% 89.59/12.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1207
% 89.59/12.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 89.59/12.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 571
% 89.59/12.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5638
% 89.59/12.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 223956
% 89.59/12.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 692294
% 89.59/12.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4225
% 89.59/12.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12888013
% 89.59/12.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7580706
% 89.59/12.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9480
% 89.59/12.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 416431
% 89.59/12.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4081
% 89.59/12.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 335
% 89.59/12.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 89.59/12.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6986199
% 89.59/12.56  
% 89.59/12.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 89.59/12.56  # User time                : 10.753 s
% 89.59/12.56  # System time              : 0.256 s
% 89.59/12.56  # Total time               : 11.009 s
% 89.59/12.56  # Maximum resident set size: 6468 pages
% 89.59/12.56  
% 89.59/12.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 89.59/12.56  # User time                : 53.370 s
% 89.59/12.56  # System time              : 1.465 s
% 89.59/12.56  # Total time               : 54.835 s
% 89.59/12.56  # Maximum resident set size: 3536 pages
% 89.59/12.56  % E---3.1 exiting
% 89.64/12.56  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------