TSTP Solution File: SWV247-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV247-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV247-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:13:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34 Wed Jun 15 18:13:44 2022
% 0.12/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27483.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.34 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.34 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 9
% 0.12/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 11
% 0.12/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 81
% 0.12/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.12/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.12/0.37 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.12/0.37 distinct function count: 6
% 0.12/0.37 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.11 sec ----> 1089 [binary,1088.1,8.1] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 14.
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 1 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),C,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 2 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg)| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(A)),c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 3 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(A),c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 4 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 5 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(D,B,C),C).
% 0.17/0.46 6 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(B,D,C),C).
% 0.17/0.46 7 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|c_in(A,B,D).
% 0.17/0.46 8 [] {+} -c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 10 [] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 11 [] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 12 [hyper,10,7] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 16 [hyper,11,7] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 67 [hyper,16,3] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 76 [hyper,67,6] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_union(v_G,A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 527 [hyper,76,4,factor_simp] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 535 [hyper,527,2,12] {-} c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 575 [hyper,535,6] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 836 [hyper,575,8] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 840 [hyper,836,1] {-} c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 863 [hyper,840,5] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(v_X,c_union(A,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 1047 [hyper,863,8] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 1048 [hyper,1047,6] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_union(v_G,A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 1062 [hyper,1048,4] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,A,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 1087 [hyper,1062,2,527] {-} c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 1088 [hyper,1087,6] {-} c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.17/0.46 1089 [binary,1088.1,8.1] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.17/0.46 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 ============ end of search ============
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.17/0.46 false clauses given 289
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 FALSE TRUE
% 0.17/0.46 10 2 0
% 0.17/0.46 11 5 0
% 0.17/0.46 12 7 0
% 0.17/0.46 13 7 0
% 0.17/0.46 14 28 0
% 0.17/0.46 15 27 0
% 0.17/0.46 16 42 0
% 0.17/0.46 17 10 0
% 0.17/0.46 18 45 0
% 0.17/0.46 19 65 0
% 0.17/0.46 20 78 0
% 0.17/0.46 21 72 0
% 0.17/0.46 22 36 0
% 0.17/0.46 23 44 0
% 0.17/0.46 24 16 0
% 0.17/0.46 tot: 484 0 (0.0% true)
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 Process 27483 finished Wed Jun 15 18:13:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------