TSTP Solution File: SWV246-2 by Gandalf---c-2.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SWV246-2 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20323/SWV/SWV246-2+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: nne
% detected subclass: small
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 27 #f 4 5)
% (binary-unit 10 #f 4 5)
% (binary-double 16 #f)
% (binary 16 #t 4 5)
% (binary-posweight-order 181 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 54 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 54 #f)
% (binary-order 27 #f 4 5)
% (binary-weightorder 71 #f)
% (binary-order 27 #f)
% (hyper-order 54 #f)
% (binary 63 #t)
% 
% 
% **** EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED ****
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(8,40,0,16,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 9 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,Y),c_^message_^oanalz(Z),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(Y,c_^message_^oanalz(Z),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 10 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,Y),c_^message_^osynth(Z),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,Y),Z,tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(Y,c_^message_^osynth(Z),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 11 [] c_in(X,c_^message_^oanalz(Y),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(X,Y,tc_^message_^omsg).
% 12 [] c_in(X,c_union(Y,Z,U),U) | -c_in(X,Z,U).
% 13 [] c_in(X,c_union(Y,Z,U),U) | -c_in(X,Y,U).
% 14 [] -c_in(X,c_union(Y,Z,U),U) | c_in(X,Z,U) | c_in(X,Y,U).
% 15 [] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),c_union(c_^message_^oanalz(c_union(v_^g,v_^h,tc_^message_^omsg)),c_^message_^osynth(v_^g),tc_^message_^omsg),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 16 [] -c_in(v_^y,c_union(c_^message_^oanalz(c_union(v_^g,v_^h,tc_^message_^omsg)),c_^message_^osynth(v_^g),tc_^message_^omsg),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 21 [hyper:14,15] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),c_^message_^oanalz(c_union(v_^g,v_^h,tc_^message_^omsg)),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),c_^message_^osynth(v_^g),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 24 [hyper:9,21] c_in(v_^y,c_^message_^oanalz(c_union(v_^g,v_^h,tc_^message_^omsg)),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),c_^message_^osynth(v_^g),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 39 [hyper:13,24,slowcut:16] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),c_^message_^osynth(v_^g),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 41 [hyper:10,39] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),v_^g,tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(v_^y,c_^message_^osynth(v_^g),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 65 [hyper:12,41,slowcut:16] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),v_^g,tc_^message_^omsg).
% 69 [hyper:13,65] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),c_union(v_^g,X,tc_^message_^omsg),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 92 [hyper:11,69] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,v_^y),c_^message_^oanalz(c_union(v_^g,X,tc_^message_^omsg)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 108 [hyper:9,92] c_in(v_^y,c_^message_^oanalz(c_union(v_^g,X,tc_^message_^omsg)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 115 [hyper:13,108,slowcut:16] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 5
% clause depth limited to 4
% seconds given: 27
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    48
%  derived clauses:   324
%  kept clauses:      86
%  kept size sum:     1001
%  kept mid-nuclei:   0
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    105
%  forw double-subs: 16
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     13
%  fast unit cutoff:  0
%  full unit cutoff:  2
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime  :  0.2
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP20323/SWV/SWV246-2+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------