TSTP Solution File: SWV245-2 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:31:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.86s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 8 unt; 5 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2)
| c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2)
| c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
cnf(c_56,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| c_in(X0,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(c_99,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).
cnf(c_137,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).
cnf(c_159,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_185,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_241,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_266,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_309,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_241]) ).
cnf(c_445,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_266,c_49,c_99,c_137,c_185]) ).
cnf(c_447,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_445,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_450,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_447,c_159]) ).
cnf(c_733,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_450,c_309]) ).
cnf(c_740,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_185,c_733]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 09:27:35 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.86/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.86/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ iProver source info
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.86/1.19 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.86/1.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.86/1.19 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 clauses 8
% 1.86/1.19 conjectures 2
% 1.86/1.19 EPR 0
% 1.86/1.19 Horn 6
% 1.86/1.19 unary 2
% 1.86/1.19 binary 4
% 1.86/1.19 lits 16
% 1.86/1.19 lits eq 0
% 1.86/1.19 fd_pure 0
% 1.86/1.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.86/1.19 fd_cond 0
% 1.86/1.19 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.86/1.19 AC symbols 0
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------
% 1.86/1.19 Current options:
% 1.86/1.19 ------
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.86/1.19
% 1.86/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------