TSTP Solution File: SWV245-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 3 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oanalz(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oanalz(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Osynth(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Osynth(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),Z,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oanalz(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
| c_in(X,c_union(U,Y,Z),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
| c_in(X,c_union(Y,U,Z),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_union(Y,Z,U),U)
| c_in(X,Z,U)
| c_in(X,Y,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(9,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0,cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(10,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1,cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(14,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0,cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1,10]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,20]) ).
cnf(26,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1,21,9]) ).
cnf(31,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(v_G,X,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1,26]) ).
cnf(148,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,20,31]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:09:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T00:09:20
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T00:09:20
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 #||
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52 ||#
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.52 ; 210 formulas have been input or derived (from 28 formulas).
% 0.19/0.52 ; 148 (70%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.19/0.52 ; 2 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.52 ; 146 (99%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.52 ;
% 0.19/0.52 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.002 4% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Assert (8 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.010 20% Process new row (185 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.004 8% Resolution (54 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (27 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (7 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (7 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.001 2% Backward subsumption (7 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (3 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.006 12% Forward simplification (185 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.002 4% Backward simplification (148 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (2 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.024 49% Other
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.049 Total
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.052 Real time
% 0.19/0.52 ;
% 0.19/0.52 ; Term-hash-array has 291 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6 entries (7 at peak, 7 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 19 nodes (41 at peak, 41 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 1 possibly forward subsuming row in 7 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 2 possibly backward subsumed rows in 7 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Path-index has 294 entries (294 at peak, 297 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Path-index has 275 nodes (275 at peak, 275 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Trie-index has 294 entries (294 at peak, 297 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Trie-index has 1,339 nodes (1,339 at peak, 1,355 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 38 generalization terms in 195 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 142 instance terms in 140 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 1,330 unifiable terms in 307 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ;
% 0.19/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.19/0.52 ; 1 with value 12 1 with value 18 1 with value 24
% 0.19/0.52 ; 1 with value 14
% 0.19/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to give has 119 entries:
% 0.19/0.52 ; 8 with value (4 15) 6 with value (4 20) 11 with value (4 24)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 3 with value (4 16) 19 with value (4 21) 4 with value (4 26)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 13 with value (4 17) 2 with value (4 22) 8 with value (4 28)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 15 with value (4 18) 12 with value (4 23) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 17 with value (4 19)
% 0.19/0.52 Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.52 0.052 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.52 0.046381 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.52 0.006159 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.52 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.52 0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.52 3,627,336 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.52 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T00:09:20
% 0.19/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.52 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------