TSTP Solution File: SWV245-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:20:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.66s 1.87s
% Output   : Refutation 1.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (   9 unt;   7 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (  10 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),C,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,B,C)
    | c_in(A,c_union(D,B,C),C) ),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,B,C)
    | c_in(A,c_union(B,D,C),C) ),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)
    | c_in(A,C,D)
    | c_in(A,B,D) ),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV245-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,7]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,7')] ).

cnf(34,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[10,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,10,2')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[34,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,34,6')] ).

cnf(348,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[39,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,39,1')] ).

cnf(352,plain,
    ( c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[348,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,348,3')] ).

cnf(372,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_X,c_union(A,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[352,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,352,5')] ).

cnf(935,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[372,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,372,1')] ).

cnf(936,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(v_G,A,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[935,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,935,6')] ).

cnf(947,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,A,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[936,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,936,4')] ).

cnf(963,plain,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,A,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[947,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,947,2')] ).

cnf(964,plain,
    c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,A,tc_Message_Omsg)),B,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[963,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,963,6')] ).

cnf(965,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[964,1]),
    [iquote('binary,964.1,1.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:17:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.66/1.87  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.66/1.87  The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 1.66/1.87  Wed Jul 27 06:17:11 2022
% 1.66/1.87  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 29742.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.66/1.87  set(auto).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.66/1.87  clear(print_given).
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  list(usable).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] -c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] -c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] -c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)|c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] -c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)|c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a).
% 1.66/1.87  0 [] -c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a)|c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)|c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a).
% 1.66/1.87  end_of_list.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.66/1.87  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.66/1.87  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.66/1.87     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  ------------> process usable:
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 1 [] -c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 2 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 3 [] -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),C,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 4 [] -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 5 [] -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(D,B,C),C).
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_union(B,D,C),C).
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 7 [] -c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|c_in(A,B,D).
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  ------------> process sos:
% 1.66/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 9 [] c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  Resetting weight limit to 14.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  Resetting weight limit to 14.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  sos_size=489
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.03 sec ----> 965 [binary,964.1,1.1] $F.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  Length of proof is 11.  Level of proof is 11.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.66/1.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.66/1.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.66/1.87  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  ============ end of search ============
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.66/1.87  clauses given                337
% 1.66/1.87  clauses generated           1484
% 1.66/1.87  clauses kept                 964
% 1.66/1.87  clauses forward subsumed     379
% 1.66/1.87  clauses back subsumed        238
% 1.66/1.87  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.66/1.87  user CPU time          0.04          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.66/1.87  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.66/1.87  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.66/1.87  
% 1.66/1.87  Process 29742 finished Wed Jul 27 06:17:13 2022
% 1.66/1.87  Otter interrupted
% 1.66/1.87  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------