TSTP Solution File: SWV245-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 10 unt; 5 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X3,X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X3,X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4) ),
cls_Set_OUnE_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
cls_Set_OUnCI_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
cls_Set_OUnCI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X4),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09 % Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:24:41 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8eC7fMHwS/E---3.1_22763.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22844 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22850 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 44
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 57
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 57
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 34
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 46
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 38
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 34
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1087
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1588 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------