TSTP Solution File: SWV245-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.15/0.16 % Problem : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.15/0.17 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 09:33:26 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.63 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.24/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.69 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.24/0.69 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.24/0.69 % Transform :cnf
% 0.24/0.69 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.24/0.69 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.24/0.69
% 0.24/0.69 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.24/0.69 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.24/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.69 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.69 % File : SWV245-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.24/0.69 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.24/0.69 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for messages
% 0.24/0.69 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.24/0.69 % English :
% 0.24/0.69
% 0.24/0.69 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.24/0.69 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.24/0.69 % Names :
% 0.24/0.69
% 0.24/0.69 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.69 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.11 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.1.0, 0.09 v5.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.24/0.69 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 2 unt; 2 nHn; 6 RR)
% 0.24/0.69 % Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% 0.24/0.69 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.24/0.69 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 0.24/0.69 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.24/0.69 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.24/0.69 % Number of variables : 20 ( 3 sgn)
% 0.24/0.69 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.24/0.69
% 0.24/0.69 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.24/0.69 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.24/0.69 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.24/0.69 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.24/0.69 % axioms.
% 0.24/0.69 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.69 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.24/0.69 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.24/0.69
% 0.24/0.69 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.24/0.69 ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.24/0.69
% 0.24/0.69 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1,axiom,
% 0.24/0.69 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.24/0.69 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.24/0.69
% 0.24/0.69 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1,axiom,
% 0.24/0.69 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.24/0.70 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.24/0.70 | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.24/0.70
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
% 0.24/0.70 ( ~ c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.24/0.70 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.24/0.70
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
% 0.24/0.70 ( ~ c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)
% 0.24/0.70 | c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 0.24/0.70
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
% 0.24/0.70 ( ~ c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)
% 0.24/0.70 | c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 0.24/0.70
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
% 0.24/0.70 ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a)
% 0.24/0.70 | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)
% 0.24/0.70 | c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a) ) ).
% 0.24/0.70
% 0.24/0.70 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.70 % Proof found
% 0.24/0.70 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.24/0.70 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.24/0.70 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.24/0.70 %VarNum:44(SingletonVarNum:20)
% 0.24/0.70 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.24/0.70 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.24/0.70 %SharedTerms:12
% 0.24/0.70 %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.24/0.70 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.24/0.70 [1]P1(f2(a1,a9),f6(f3(f6(a4,a8,a5)),f7(a4),a5),a5)
% 0.24/0.70 [2]~P1(a1,f6(f3(f6(a4,a8,a5)),f7(a4),a5),a5)
% 0.24/0.70 [3]~P1(x31,x32,a5)+P1(x31,f3(x32),a5)
% 0.24/0.70 [4]P1(x41,f3(x42),a5)+~P1(f2(x41,x43),f3(x42),a5)
% 0.24/0.70 [5]~P1(x51,x53,x54)+P1(x51,f6(x52,x53,x54),x54)
% 0.24/0.70 [6]~P1(x61,x62,x64)+P1(x61,f6(x62,x63,x64),x64)
% 0.24/0.70 [7]P1(x71,f7(x72),a5)+P1(f2(x71,x73),x72,a5)+~P1(f2(x71,x73),f7(x72),a5)
% 0.24/0.70 [8]P1(x81,x82,x83)+P1(x81,x84,x83)+~P1(x81,f6(x84,x82,x83),x83)
% 0.24/0.70 %EqnAxiom
% 0.24/0.70
% 0.24/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.24/0.70 (~P1(f2(a1,x111),f3(f6(a4,a8,a5)),a5)),
% 0.24/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6,5,4])).
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.24/0.70 (P1(f2(a1,a9),a4,a5)),
% 0.24/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,5,4,8,7])).
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.24/0.70 (P1(f2(a1,a9),f3(f7(a4)),a5)),
% 0.24/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,5,4,8,7,3])).
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(23,plain,
% 0.24/0.70 (~P1(f2(a1,x231),f6(a4,a8,a5),a5)),
% 0.24/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,11,5,4,3])).
% 0.24/0.70 cnf(33,plain,
% 0.24/0.70 ($false),
% 0.24/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,23,3,5,6]),
% 0.24/0.70 ['proof']).
% 0.24/0.70 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.24/0.70 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------