TSTP Solution File: SWV244-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   9   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f15,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( c_in(X2,c_union(X5,X3,X4),X4)
      | ~ c_in(X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f9,f4]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( c_in(X2,c_union(X5,X3,X4),X4)
      | ~ c_in(X2,X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f6,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(X2,c_union(X5,X3,X4),X4)
      | c_in(X2,X3,X4)
      | c_in(X2,X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : SWV244-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:09:18 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  % (26062)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.50  % (26062)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.50  % (26062)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50  % (26062)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.22/0.51  % (26078)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)Time elapsed: 0.091 s
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  % (26062)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  % (26070)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.22/0.51  % (26070)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.52  % (26078)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)Time elapsed: 0.102 s
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52  % (26070)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52  % (26053)Success in time 0.146 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------